Literature DB >> 7617153

Cerebral lateralization for the processing of spatial coordinates and categories in left-and right-handers.

B LAENG1, M PETERS.   

Abstract

Subjects judged whether a tachistoscopially lateralized drawing was identical or different to a drawing seen immediately before in free vision. The drawings depicted natural objects (e.g. animals). On half of the trials the tachistoscopic drawing presented the same objects but either the categorical or the coordinate spatial relations (according to Kosslyn's definitions [23]) between the objects were transformed. In the first experiment 38 right-handed subjects (half males and half females) were tested. Categorical judgements were faster when the match drawing appeared in the right visual field, whereas coordinate judgements were faster when the match drawing appeared in the left visual field. In the second experiment 26 right-handed and 40 left-handed subjects participated. Almost all the subjects were female. Right-handed subjects replicated the findings of the subjects in the first experiment. However, the LHs did not show any difference in response times between spatial conditions and visual fields. These findings support Kosslyn's hypothesis that the left and right hemispheres are specialized respectively for processing categorical and coordinate spatial relations. Moreover, they also suggest that this lateralization pattern is not typical of left-handers.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7617153     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00126-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  11 in total

1.  Lateralization of spatial categories: a comparison of verbal and visuospatial categorical relations.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert Postma
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

2.  Memory for locations within regions: spatial biases and visual hemifield differences.

Authors:  B Laeng; M Peters; B McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

3.  Establishing hand preference: why does it matter?

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Anam Taufiq
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-02-24

4.  Individual differences in spatial relation processing: effects of strategy, ability, and gender.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Gregoire Borst
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  Sex differences in the weighting of metric and categorical information in spatial location memory.

Authors:  Mark P Holden; Sarah J Duff-Canning; Elizabeth Hampson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-01-17

6.  Perceived effort affects choice of limb and reaction time of movements.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Peter S Lum; Reza Shadmehr; Sang Wook Lee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Retinotopic mapping of categorical and coordinate spatial relation processing in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Maarten J A Duijndam; Mathijs Raemaekers; Richard J A van Wezel; Anna Oleksiak; Albert Postma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The what and why of perceptual asymmetries in the visual domain.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Haruyuki Kojima
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-12-15

9.  Effects of age, sex and arm on the precision of arm position sense-left-arm superiority in healthy right-handers.

Authors:  Lena Schmidt; Lena Depper; Georg Kerkhoff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Where Are the Months? Mental Images of Circular Time in a Large Online Sample.

Authors:  Bruno Laeng; Anders Hofseth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.