Literature DB >> 7616861

Attendance, content and relevance of the six week postnatal examination.

D E Bick, C MacArthur.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to describe the attendance and content of the six week postnatal examination, and associate the examinations performed with relevant delivery factors and postpartum symptoms.
DESIGN: survey of 1278 women who responded to a postal questionnaire sent 6-7 months after delivery, as part of a wider study investigating the severity, effect and extent of long-term health problems after childbirth. Questions about attendance and content of the postnatal examination were included. Data obtained from the women were linked to the obstetric case notes.
SETTING: a large maternity hospital in Birmingham. PARTICIPANTS: all women who had delivered between April and September 1992, except for those who had had a neonatal death and, due to lack of funding for translators, Asian women.
FINDINGS: the majority of women (91%) attended for their postnatal examination and 93% of these had an abdominal and 70% a vaginal examination. Women who had a vaginal delivery and perineal trauma were significantly more likely to have a vaginal examination but still over two-thirds of those with an intact perineum and almost half delivered by elective caesarean section also had this. Only 16% of women had a blood test. Those who had a PPH, a low third day Hb or reported a new postpartum onset of fatigue were more likely to have a blood test, but three-quarters of the women with these risk factors did not have blood taken. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: women are prepared to attend for postnatal assessment but many have examinations without obvious reason, whilst other tests which might be helpful for certain conditions are infrequently used. Substantial postpartum morbidity is known to exist and this is not routinely assessed at the postnatal assessment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: the present six week postnatal examination does not appear to meet the health needs of women after childbirth: its content and timing should be reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7616861     DOI: 10.1016/0266-6138(95)90069-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  7 in total

1.  Use of postpartum health services in rural Uganda: knowledge, attitudes, and barriers.

Authors:  Sarah K Nabukera; Kim Witte; Charles Muchunguzi; Francis Bajunirwe; Vincent K Batwala; Edgar M Mulogo; Celeste Farr; Souleymane Barry; Hamisu M Salihu
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-04

2.  The role of the general practitioner in postnatal care: a survey from Australian general practice.

Authors:  J Gunn; J Lumley; D Young
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  An analysis of demographic and pregnancy outcome data to explain non-attendance for postpartum glucose testing in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: Why are patients missing follow-up?

Authors:  Zora A Castling; Tom Farrell
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2018-11-07

4.  Postnatal checks and primary care consultations in the year following childbirth: an observational cohort study of 309 573 women in the UK, 2006-2016.

Authors:  Holly Christina Smith; Sonia Saxena; Irene Petersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Inequities in maternal postnatal visits among public and private patients: 2004 Pelotas cohort study.

Authors:  Alicia Matijasevich; Iná S Santos; Mariângela F Silveira; Marlos R Domingues; Aluísio J D Barros; Paula L Marco; Fernando C Barros
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  The relationship between socioeconomic indicators during pregnancy and gynecological appointment at any time after childbirth.

Authors:  Alexandre Faisal-Cury; Julieta Quayle; Tatiana Marques; Paulo Rossi Menezes; Alicia Matijasevich
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2015-08-12

Review 7.  Clinical guidelines for postpartum women and infants in primary care-a systematic review.

Authors:  Crishan Haran; Mieke van Driel; Benjamin L Mitchell; Wendy E Brodribb
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.