Literature DB >> 7616261

Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: results of 325 cases.

J G Golfinos1, B C Fitzpatrick, L R Smith, R F Spetzler.   

Abstract

The viewing wand is a frameless stereotactic arm that can be used in conjunction with computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to provide image-based intraoperative navigation. The authors report a series of 325 cases in which the viewing wand was used and evaluated for its utility, ease of integration into the standard surgical setup, reliability, and real-world accuracy. The use of the system was associated with minimal additional effort or time spent in setting up the procedure as long as a trained technician performed the data transfer and reconstruction. The viewing wand was used in 165 cases in conjunction with CT and 145 cases with MR imaging. The system was reliable, achieving a useful registration in 310 of 325 cases (95.4%). Fiducial-based registration was more accurate than an anatomical landmark-surface fit algorithm method of registration (mean 2.8 vs. 5.6 mm error, respectively, for CT; and mean 3.0 vs. 6.2 mm for MR imaging). The actual error of the system in estimating the position of the probe tip just after registration was judged by the operating surgeon to be less than 2 mm in 92% of MR imaging cases and in 82% of CT cases, between 2 and 5 mm in 7% of MR imaging and 17% of CT cases, and greater than 5 mm in less than 1% of MR imaging and 1.2% of CT cases. The accuracy of the system degraded during the operation, so that by the third evaluation the error was estimated to be less than 2 mm in 77% of MR imaging and 62% of CT cases. Overall, the viewing wand was found to be reliable and accurate. This real-world accuracy was sufficient for a broad range of applications including glioma resection, cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures, resection of small subcortical masses, and temporal lobe resection. The system is a useful navigational aid that allows a direct approach to intracranial pathology without the drawbacks of application and the limitations of a stereotactic frame.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7616261     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  33 in total

Review 1.  The role of image-guided technology in the surgical planning and resection of gliomas.

Authors:  G H Barnett
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Pre-operative planning and intra-operative guidance in modern neurosurgery: a review of 300 cases.

Authors:  J Wadley; N Dorward; N Kitchen; D Thomas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  The evolution of stereotactic guidance in neuroendoscopy.

Authors:  Wuttipong Tirakotai; Oliver Bozinov; Ulrich Sure; Thomas Riegel; Helmut Bertalanffy; Dieter Hellwig
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Neuronavigation and complication rate in epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Joachim Oertel; Michael Robert Gaab; Uwe Runge; Henry Werner Siegfried Schroeder; Wolfgang Wagner; Jürgen Piek
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2004-03-27       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Accuracy of biopsy needle navigation using the Medarpa system--computed tomography reality superimposed on the site of intervention.

Authors:  M Fawad Khan; Selami Dogan; Adel Maataoui; Jessen Gurung; Mirko Schiemann; Hanns Ackermann; Stefan Wesarg; Georgios Sakas; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparison of Different Computer-Aided Surgery Systems in Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  U Ecke; B Luebben; J Maurer; S Boor; W J Mann
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2003-02

7.  Use of the LandmarXtrade mark Surgical Navigation System in Lateral Skull Base and Temporal Bone Surgery.

Authors:  H Staecker; B W O'malley; H Eisenberg; B E Yoder
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2001-11

8.  Portable CT scanner-based navigation in lumbar pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Pavel Barsa; Petr Suchomel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Utility of frameless stereotaxy in the resection of skull base and Basal cerebral lesions in children.

Authors:  E Alshail; J T Rutka; J M Drake; H J Hoffman; R Humphreys; J Phillips; M Cusimano; V Forte; B Papsin; S Holowka
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1998

10.  [Best matching. Experimental comparison of different matching procedures for use in computer navigation].

Authors:  A Schäffler; B König; N P Haas; U Stöckle
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.