Literature DB >> 7615614

Cyclical micromovement and fracture healing.

M H Noordeen1, C B Lavy, N S Shergill, J D Tuite, A M Jackson.   

Abstract

We studied 56 patients with fractures of the tibial shaft in a multicentre prospective randomised trial of three methods of external fixation. Group I was treated with a fixator which was unlocked at 4 to 6 weeks to allow free axial compression (axial dynamisation) with weight-bearing. Group II was treated with a fixator that was similarly unlocked at 4 to 6 weeks but included a small silicone spring which on weight-bearing could be compressed by up to 2 mm. this spring returns to its original length on cessation of weight-bearing thus allowing cycles of motion of up to 2 mm. Group III had a spring fixator like group II, but it was unlocked from the start to allow cyclical micromovement as soon as weight-bearing began. Fracture healing was monitored by the measurement of fracture stiffness. We defined healing as achieving a stiffness of 15 Nm per degree. The mean time was 14.1 weeks in group I, 15.9 weeks in group II, and 19.3 weeks in group III. The difference between groups was statistically significant (p = 0.004). The 95% confidence intervals for the average delay in healing with early cyclical micromovement (group III) as compared with later axial dynamisation (group I) was 1.8 to 8.7 weeks. The healing time in patients whose cyclical micromovement was delayed for 4 to 6 weeks (group II) was between these two extremes, but the differences from either of the other groups could have been due to patient selection. In the patients who completed the full trial, there were pin-track infections in over 60% of those in the cyclical micromovement groups compared with 20% in the axial dynamisation group (p = 0.03).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7615614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Dynamization of fracture fixation : Timing and methods].

Authors:  L Claes
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Temporal variation in fixation stiffness affects healing by differential cartilage formation in a rat osteotomy model.

Authors:  Bettina M Willie; Robert Blakytny; Melanie Glöckelmann; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Claes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Ball-joint versus single monolateral external fixators for definitive treatment of tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  Michail Beltsios; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Olga D Savvidou; Eirineos Karamanis; Zinon T Kokkalis; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-16

4.  Complications after proximal abducting ulnar osteotomy and prognostic factors in 66 dogs.

Authors:  Alan Danielski; Alexander Krekis; Russell Yeadon; Miguel Angel Solano; Tim Parkin; Aldo Vezzoni; Ingo Pfeil
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 1.618

5.  Stability at the half pin-frame interface on external fixation constructs.

Authors:  Alexios Dimitrios Iliadis; Parag Kumar Jaiswal; Jay Meswania; Gordon Blunn; David Goodier; Peter Calder
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2016-10-13

Review 6.  A Concert between Biology and Biomechanics: The Influence of the Mechanical Environment on Bone Healing.

Authors:  Vaida Glatt; Christopher H Evans; Kevin Tetsworth
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  Biomechanical analysis of plate systems for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ali Jabran; Chris Peach; Lei Ren
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Vibration acceleration promotes endochondral formation during fracture healing through cellular chondrogenic differentiation.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yokoi; Yasuhiro Take; Ryohei Uchida; Takuya Magome; Kazunori Shimomura; Tatsuo Mae; Tomoko Okamoto; Tatsuhiro Hanai; Yang Chong; Seira Sato; Minami Hikida; Ken Nakata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Stress and stability comparison between different systems for high tibial osteotomies.

Authors:  Chu-An Luo; Shi-Yuan Hua; Shang-Chih Lin; Chun-Ming Chen; Ching-Shiow Tseng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Placement-induced effects on high tibial osteotomized construct - biomechanical tests and finite-element analyses.

Authors:  Chu-An Luo; Su-Yang Hwa; Shang-Chih Lin; Chun-Ming Chen; Ching-Shiow Tseng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.