Literature DB >> 7615611

The response of muscle to leg lengthening.

A H Simpson1, P E Williams, P Kyberd, G Goldspink, J Kenwright.   

Abstract

We used an experimental rabbit model of leg lengthening to study the morphology and function of muscle after different distraction rates. Lengthening was in twice-daily increments from 0.4 to 4 mm per day. New contractile tissue formed during lengthening, but some damage to the muscle fibres was seen even at rates of less than 1 mm per day; abnormalities increased with larger rates of lengthening. There was proliferation of fibrous tissue between the muscle fibres at distraction rates of over 1 mm per day. Active muscle function showed adaptation when the rate was 1.0 mm per day or less, but muscle compliance was normal only after rates of 0.4 mm per day. Muscle responded more favourably at rates of distraction slower than those shown to lead to the most prolific bone formation. At present the rate of distraction in clinical practice is determined mainly by factors which enhance osteogenesis. Our study suggests that it may be advisable to use a slower rate of elongation in patients with poor muscle compliance associated with the underlying pathology; this will allow better accommodation by the contractile and connective tissues of the muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7615611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  23 in total

1.  Muscle force and power following tendon repair at altered tendon length.

Authors:  Daniel J Krochmal; William M Kuzon; Melanie G Urbanchek
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Effects of tensile stress on the alpha1 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor expression in maxillofacial skeletal myocytes.

Authors:  Xiuping Wu; Hui Gao; Danna Xiao; Songjiao Luo; Zhihe Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  The morphological basis of increased stiffness of rabbit tibialis anterior muscles during surgical limb-lengthening.

Authors:  P Williams; P Kyberd; H Simpson; J Kenwright; G Goldspink
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  What risk factors predict usage of gastrocsoleus recession during tibial lengthening?

Authors:  S Robert Rozbruch; Samuel Zonshayn; Saravanaraja Muthusamy; Eugene W Borst; Austin T Fragomen; Joseph T Nguyen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Distraction histogenesis of the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Aydin Gülses; Metin Sencimen; Mustafa Ayna; Matthias Gierloff; Yahya Açil
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-18

6.  Botulinum toxin a does not decrease calf pain or improve ROM during limb lengthening: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Lee; Keun Jung Ryu; Dong Eun Shin; Hyun Woo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Neglected patella nonunion successfully treated after 8 years by quadriceps distractive lengthening with a spanning unilateral external fixation system.

Authors:  Odysseas Paxinos; Athanasios Karamitros; Panagiotis Douras; Nikolaos Kouris
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors reduce sarcomere addition in rat skeletal muscle.

Authors:  T J Koh; J G Tidball
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Femoral lengthening with a rail external fixator: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Selvadurai Nayagam
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2010-11-04

10.  Impact of leg lengthening on viscoelastic properties of the deep fascia.

Authors:  Hai-Qiang Wang; Yi-Yong Wei; Zi-Xiang Wu; Zhuo-Jing Luo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.