Literature DB >> 7615120

Is one testicular specimen sufficient for quantitative evaluation of spermatogenesis?

S Gottschalk-Sabag1, D B Weiss, N Folb-Zacharow, Z Zukerman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether quantitative analysis performed on one testicular specimen is adequate for quantitative evaluation of spermatogenic process.
DESIGN: Comparison of quantitative analysis of spermatogenic cell types in testicular cytologic aspirates of various sites of each testis.
SETTING: In each aspirate, a total of 500 Sertoli cells and cells at each of the spermatogenic stages were identified, counted, and grouped according to cell type. A quantitative cell type index was calculated for each type of cell in each aspirate. Mean cell type indexes then were calculated for each of the cell types in the three aspirates of each patient, and variations of a given sample from its mean were compared. PATIENTS: Azoospermic or severely oligospermic infertile men.
INTERVENTIONS: Fine needle aspiration performed on the upper, middle, and lower poles of each testis.
RESULTS: Each of the aspirates showed wide deviations from the mean of the three aspirates for that patient. The deviation ranges of the cell type indexes of each of the spermatogenic stages were as follows: spermatogonia, 0.8% to 200%; spermatocytes, 1.4% to 94.3%; spermatids, 2.9% to 200%; and spermatozoa, 0.7% to 128%. In the majority of the patients, at least one of the three aspirates showed a cell type index score that was statistically different from the others.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that more than one testicular specimen is needed to evaluate quantitatively the spermatogenic process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7615120     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57741-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  3 in total

1.  Is diagnostic testicular fine needle aspiration necessary in azoospermic men before sperm aspiration/extraction for intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles?

Authors:  Z Zukerman; R Orvieto; O M Avrech; D B Weiss; S Gottschalk-Sabag; E Bar-On; O Rufas; I Bar-Hava; Z Ben-Rafael; B Fisch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  A comparative study of three techniques for the analysis of sperm recovery: touch-print cytology, wet preparation, and testicular histopathology.

Authors:  S Kahraman; K Yakin; M Samli; F Vanlioğlu; G Karlikaya; S Sertyel; E Dönmez
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Serum testosterone levels and other determinants of sperm retrieval in microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

Authors:  Sultan A Althakafi; Osama M Mustafa; Raouf M Seyam; Naif Al-Hathal; Said Kattan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.