Literature DB >> 7614645

Changing the admission process for elective surgery: an economic analysis.

P Boothe1, B A Finegan.   

Abstract

This study compared the costs of an inpatient elective surgical admission process with an outpatient based same day admission programme in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The effect of this process change on annual surgical volume and case flow (number of procedures performed per surgical bed) in the year before the initiation of same-day method (1989/90) and subsequent to the widespread use of the process (1992/93), was also assessed. Costs incurred by 53 patients who underwent preoperative anaesthetic and surgical assessment as outpatients and were admitted as an outpatient on the day of surgery (SD Group) were compared with those incurred by 11 patients who entered hospital on the day before surgery and underwent anaesthetic and other assessments as inpatients (IP Group). Nursing, radiology, laboratory, operating room, rehabilitation and clinic costs were obtained for each patient. The remaining costs were not amenable to individual attribution and were assigned to each group as a percentage of the allocated costs. The cost per case in the SD Group was $360 less than in the IP Group, reflecting decreased nursing costs incurred by the SD Group. Between the period 1989/90 and 1992/93, the number of surgical beds declined 15.7%; however, surgical volume decreased by only 5.4%. Total case flow improved by 12.2%, that for elective and non-elective surgery increasing by 14.1% and 9.5%, respectively. Elective surgery, where same day admission was used, showed the greatest improvement in case flow. We conclude that a same day admission process reduces cost and serves to enhance hospital productivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7614645     DOI: 10.1007/BF03015483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  7 in total

1.  Preadmission and outpatient consultation clinics.

Authors:  B A Finegan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Same-day surgical admission. American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Surgery Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Cost reduction in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  A Hamilton; C Norris; R Wensel; A Koshal
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Carotid endarterectomy: a safe cost-efficient approach.

Authors:  P E Collier
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Selection of patients for same-day coronary bypass operations.

Authors:  R P Anderson; S W Guyton; D L Paull; S L Tidwell
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  The cost-effectiveness of same-day admission surgery.

Authors:  J Keithley; G L Glandon; J Llewellyn; B Berger; D Levin
Journal:  Nurs Econ       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.085

7.  Nursing workload, medical diagnosis related groups, and nursing diagnoses.

Authors:  E J Halloran
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.228

  7 in total
  19 in total

1.  Exploring obstacles to proper timing of prophylactic antibiotics for surgical site infections.

Authors:  J A Tan; V N Naik; L Lingard
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-02

2.  Are ambulatory surgical patients as healthy as we think? Using a self-reported health status questionnaire to identify unsuspected medical comorbidities.

Authors:  C Ronald Mackenzie; Lisa A Mandl; Cookie Reyes; Marc Lachs; Steven Magid
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-09

3.  i-gel™ in Ambulatory Surgery: A Comparison with LMA-ProSeal™ in Paralyzed Anaesthetized Patients.

Authors:  Anjan Das; Saikat Majumdar; Anindya Mukherjee; Tapobrata Mitra; Ratul Kundu; Bimal Kumar Hajra; Dipankar Mukherjee; Bibhukalyani Das
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-03-15

4.  A decision support simulation model for the management of an elective surgery waiting system.

Authors:  J E Everett
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2002-04

5.  Day of surgery admission for the elective surgical in-patient: successful implementation of the Elective Surgery Programme.

Authors:  E S Concannon; A M Hogan; L Flood; W Khan; R Waldron; K Barry
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Effectiveness of a Surgery Admission Unit for patients undergoing major elective surgery in a tertiary university hospital.

Authors:  B Ortiga; C Capdevila; A Salazar; M F Viso; C Bartolomé; X Corbella
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Cancellation of elective cases in pediatric surgery: An audit.

Authors:  Sapna Bathla; Anup Mohta; Aikta Gupta; Geeta Kamal
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-07

8.  Palonosetron: A novel approach to control postoperative nausea and vomiting in day care surgery.

Authors:  Sukhminderjit Singh Bajwa; Sukhwinder Kaur Bajwa; Jasbir Kaur; Veenita Sharma; Amarjit Singh; Anita Singh; Sps Goraya; Ss Parmar; Kamaljit Singh
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-01

9.  The efficacy of ginger added to ondansetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in ambulatory surgery.

Authors:  Pragnadyuti Mandal; Anjan Das; Saikat Majumdar; Tapas Bhattacharyya; Tapobrata Mitra; Ratul Kundu
Journal:  Pharmacognosy Res       Date:  2014-01

10.  PONV in Ambulatory surgery: A comparison between Ramosetron and Ondansetron: a prospective, double-blinded, and randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Debasis Banerjee; Anjan Das; Saikat Majumdar; Rahul Deb Mandal; Soumyadip Dutta; Anindya Mukherjee; Aparna Chakraborty; Sandip Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.