Literature DB >> 7614086

The effect of knee flexion and quadriceps contraction on the axial view of the patella.

B A Masri1, R G McCormack.   

Abstract

Axial views of the patella are standard in the investigation of anterior knee symptoms, and many investigators use congruence angles and patellar tilt in determining the diagnosis and appropriate treatment. A variety of different methods are used to obtain axial radiographs of the patella, but they are static representations of a dynamic phenomenon. The effect of quadriceps contraction on these indices has not been well defined. The purpose of this study was to compare the 30 degree axial view of the patella with the 45 degree axial view of the patella and to study the effect of quadriceps contraction on the 30 degree axial radiograph of the patella. Forty knees with normal patellofemoral joints and 20 knees with patellar subluxation were radiographed using 30 degree axial views of the patella with the quadriceps relaxed and contracted and with 45 degree axial views with the quadriceps relaxed. There was no significant difference in the sulcus or congruence angles between the 30 and 45 degree axial view in either the control or the patellar subluxation group. Contraction of the quadriceps did not cause a significant or consistent alteration in the congruence angles in either group. With quadriceps contraction, 55% of patients will centralize the patella, whereas 40% will actually increase lateral tracking or subluxation. In conclusion, the 30 degree axial view of the patella is equivalent to the 45 degree axial view in the assessment of patellar subluxation. Quadriceps contraction does not alter the congruence angles obtained in these axial views in a significant or consistent manner.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7614086     DOI: 10.1097/00042752-199501000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Sport Med        ISSN: 1050-642X            Impact factor:   3.638


  7 in total

1.  Patellofemoral kinematics in mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing posterior stabilised total knee replacements: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  G Heinert; D Kendoff; S Preiss; T Gehrke; P Sussmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  No difference in patellar kinematics between fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation.

Authors:  Armin Keshmiri; Günther Maderbacher; Achim Benditz; Werner Müller; Joachim Grifka; Benjamin Craiovan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Is it possible to re-establish pre-operative patellar kinematics using a ligament-balanced technique in total knee arthroplasty? A cadaveric investigation.

Authors:  Armin Keshmiri; Hans Springorum; Clemens Baier; Florian Zeman; Joachim Grifka; Günther Maderbacher
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Mobile bearing and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marcello Capella; Marco Dolfin; Francesco Saccia
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

5.  Changes in sagittal component alignment alters patellar kinematics in TKA: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Armin Keshmiri; Hans Robert Springorum; Clemens Baier; Florian Zeman; Joachim Grifka; Günther Maderbacher
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The influence of component alignment on patellar kinematics in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Armin Keshmiri; Günther Maderbacher; Clemens Baier; Ernst Sendtner; Jens Schaumburger; Florian Zeman; Joachim Grifka; Hans R Springorum
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Medial Open Wedge High tibial Osteotomy (MOWHTO) does not relevantly alter patellar kinematics: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Felix Greimel; Guenther Maderbacher; Clemens Baier; Bernd Krieg; Florian Zeman; Joachim Grifka; Armin Keshmiri
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.067

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.