Literature DB >> 7613737

Interactions between bacteria and harmful algae: a review.

G J Doucette1.   

Abstract

The ways in which bacteria interact with eukaryotic, unicellular algae are extremely diverse. Such relationships vary widely according to a number of criteria, including spatial and temporal scales, the degree of specificity, and if the relationship can be characterized as beneficial or detrimental to any of the organisms involved. These criteria can be applied to our assessment of how microbes interact with those species involved in the formation of harmful algal blooms (HABs). The aim of this paper is to assess the current state of our knowledge of bacterial/HAB interactions as they pertain to the influence of bacteria on HAB population dynamics, the role of bacteria in the production of toxins normally attributed to the algae, and the suggestion that HABs may act as vectors for pathogenic bacteria. Given that viruses are now considered to play a potentially important role in structuring phytoplankton communities, the possible effects of viruses on the population dynamics of harmful algal species are also addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7613737     DOI: 10.1002/nt.2620030202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Toxins        ISSN: 1056-9014


  31 in total

1.  Links between phytoplankton and bacterial community dynamics in a coastal marine environment.

Authors:  J N Rooney-Varga; M W Giewat; M C Savin; S Sood; M LeGresley; J L Martin
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Phylogenetic diversity and specificity of bacteria closely associated with Alexandrium spp. and other phytoplankton.

Authors:  Suresh Jasti; Michael E Sieracki; Nicole J Poulton; Michael W Giewat; Juliette N Rooney-Varga
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Zooming in on the phycosphere: the ecological interface for phytoplankton-bacteria relationships.

Authors:  Justin R Seymour; Shady A Amin; Jean-Baptiste Raina; Roman Stocker
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 17.745

Review 4.  Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in the Phycosphere of Phytoplankton: a Case of Chemical Interactions in Ecology.

Authors:  Jean Luc Rolland; Didier Stien; Sophie Sanchez-Ferandin; Raphaël Lami
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  A novel inducer of Roseobacter motility is also a disruptor of algal symbiosis.

Authors:  Preeti Sule; Robert Belas
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 6.  Prymnesins: toxic metabolites of the golden alga, Prymnesium parvum Carter (Haptophyta).

Authors:  Schonna R Manning; John W La Claire
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 5.118

7.  Transcriptome profiling of a toxic dinoflagellate reveals a gene-rich protist and a potential impact on gene expression due to bacterial presence.

Authors:  Ahmed Moustafa; Andrew N Evans; David M Kulis; Jeremiah D Hackett; Deana L Erdner; Donald M Anderson; Debashish Bhattacharya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of violacein-producing bacteria on survival and feeding of bacterivorous nanoflagellates.

Authors:  Carsten Matz; Peter Deines; Jens Boenigk; Hartmut Arndt; Leo Eberl; Staffan Kjelleberg; Klaus Jürgens
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Isolation and characterization of a marine algicidal bacterium against the harmful raphidophyceae Chattonella marina.

Authors:  Yun Sook Kim; Dae-Sung Lee; Seong-Yun Jeong; Woe Jae Lee; Myung-Suk Lee
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.422

10.  Host-specific adaptation governs the interaction of the marine diatom, Pseudo-nitzschia and their microbiota.

Authors:  Marilou P Sison-Mangus; Sunny Jiang; Kevin N Tran; Raphael M Kudela
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.