Literature DB >> 7610588

How applicable are animal myopia models to human juvenile onset myopia?

K Zadnik1, D O Mutti.   

Abstract

Investigations into the plasticity of eye growth and refractive error development have significantly expanded our knowledge of animal models of myopia in the last 15 yr. The applicability of this information is as yet undetermined, but hopefully this information will be useful in learning more about human myopia. This paper presents a critical review of the animal myopia literature as those data relate to the human condition. Differences between the chicken, tree shrew, and primate animal models of myopia are outlined, and the various experimental paradigms used to investigate refractive error development and ocular growth in the chicken are compared. Specific arguments against the application of animal models of myopia to the etiology of human juvenile onset myopia include the following: (1) there is no deprivation of form vision in the environment of the school-aged child as severe as that required to induce myopia in animals; (2) the sensitive period for deprivation myopia in animals appears to be too early to account for human juvenile onset myopia; and (3) studies in the chicken using spectacle lenses to create dioptric blur involve a choroidal thickness modulation that has no human analog. Ultimately, the results of investigations into the cellular and biochemical modulation of eye growth in animals may be the most relevant to human myopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7610588     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00234-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Monovision slows juvenile myopia progression unilaterally.

Authors:  J R Phillips
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Long-wavelength (red) light produces hyperopia in juvenile and adolescent tree shrews.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne; Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Guinea pig ciliary muscle development.

Authors:  Andrew D Pucker; Ashley R Carpenter; Kirk M McHugh; Donald O Mutti
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Optical and biometric characteristics of anisomyopia in human adults.

Authors:  Yibin Tian; Janice Tarrant; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Perspective: how might emmetropization and genetic factors produce myopia in normal eyes?

Authors:  John T Siegwart; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  The effect of age on compensation for a negative lens and recovery from lens-induced myopia in tree shrews (Tupaia glis belangeri).

Authors:  Thomas T Norton; Angela O Amedo; John T Siegwart
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Novel evidence for complement system activation in chick myopia and hyperopia models: a meta-analysis of transcriptome datasets.

Authors:  Nina Riddell; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Spatial Frequency Content of Urban and Indoor Environments as a Potential Risk Factor for Myopia Development.

Authors:  Daniel Ian Flitcroft; Elise N Harb; Christine Frances Wildsoet
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.