Literature DB >> 7610224

Do increases in payments for obstetrical deliveries affect prenatal care?

M H Fox1, K L Phua.   

Abstract

Raising fees is one of the primary means that State Medicaid Programs employ to maintain provider participation. While a number of studies have sought to quantify the extent to which this policy retains or attracts providers, few have looked at the impact of these incentives on patients. In this study, the authors used Medicaid claims data to examine changes in volume and site of prenatal care among women who delivered babies after the Maryland Medicaid Program raised physicians fees for deliveries 200 percent at the end of its 1986 fiscal year. Although the State's intent was to stabilize the pool of nonhospital providers who were willing to deliver Medicaid babies, it was also hoped that women would benefit through greater access to prenatal care, especially care rendered in a nonhospital setting. The authors' hypotheses were that (a) the fee increase for obstetrical deliveries would result in an increase in prenatal visits by women on Medicaid, and (b) the fee increase would lead to a shift in prenatal visits from hospital to community based providers. The data for Maryland's Medicaid claims for the fiscal years 1985 through 1987 were used. Comparisons were made in the average number of prenatal visits and the ratio of hospital to nonhospital prenatal visits before and after the fee increase. Data for continuously enrolled women who delivered in the last 4 months of each fiscal year were analyzed for between and within year differences using Student's t-test and ANOVA techniques. The findings indicate very little overall change in either the amount or location of prenatal care during the year after the large fee increase for deliveries.Though significant increases in the number of prenatal visits occurred for women who lived outside of Baltimore City, it is difficult to attribute these changes solely to the fee increase. Where an effect was observed, it appeared to be greatest in non urban areas of the State, probably because coordination of care by fewer Medicaid providers is more common in such areas.The findings do not support the hypotheses that raising fees for obstetrical deliveries uniformly increase community-based prenatal care. Instead, the findings suggest that tying fee increases for obstetrical deliveries to the amount of prenatal care provided for each patient may be the best way of increasing the commitment of Medicaid obstetrical providers to give their patients more comprehensive perinatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7610224      PMCID: PMC1382127     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  15 in total

1.  Reimbursement and access to physicians' services under Medicaid.

Authors:  S H Long; R F Settle; B C Stuart
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Effect of Medicaid payment levels on access to obstetrical care.

Authors:  M H Fox; J P Weiner; K Phua
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Effects of Medicaid eligibility expansion on prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in Tennessee.

Authors:  J M Piper; W A Ray; M R Griffin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The impact of Medicaid on physician use by low-income children.

Authors:  M L Rosenbach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Physician supply and Medicaid participation. The causes of market failure.

Authors:  J W Fossett; J A Peterson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Pediatricians participating in Medicaid.

Authors:  M H Fox; K L Phua
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-12-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Medicaid policy and the substitution of hospital outpatient care for physician care.

Authors:  J W Cohen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Reducing public expenditures for physician services: the price of paying less.

Authors:  J R Gabel; T H Rice
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.265

9.  Prepaid versus traditional Medicaid plans: lack of effect on pregnancy outcomes and prenatal care.

Authors:  T S Carey; K Weis; C Homer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The impact of the Mississippi Improved Child Health Project on prenatal care and low birthweight.

Authors:  D M Strobino; G A Chase; Y J Kim; B E Crawley; J H Salim; G Baruffi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.