Literature DB >> 7610046

Triple helix DNA alters nucleosomal histone-DNA interactions and acts as a nucleosome barrier.

L Westin1, P Blomquist, J F Milligan, O Wrange.   

Abstract

Oligonucleotides which form triple helical complexes on double-stranded DNA have been previously reported to selectively inhibit transcription both in vitro and in vivo by physically blocking RNA polymerase or transcription factor access to the DNA template. Here we show that a 16mer oligonucleotide, which forms triple helix DNA by binding to a 16 bp homopurine segment, alters the formation of histone-DNA contacts during in vitro nucleosome reconstitution. This effect was DNA sequence-specific and required the oligonucleotide to be present during in vitro nucleosome reconstitution. Binding of the triple helix oligonucleotide on a 199 bp mouse mammary tumour virus promoter DNA fragment with a centrally located triplex DNA resulted in interruption of histone-DNA contacts flanking the triplex DNA segment. When nucleosome reconstitution is carried out on a longer, 279 bp DNA fragment with an asymmetrically located triplex site, nucleosome formation occurred at the border of the triple helical DNA. In this case the triplex DNA functioned as a nucleosome barrier. We conclude that triplex DNA cannot be accommodated within a nucleosome context and thus may be used to site-specifically manipulate nucleosome organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7610046      PMCID: PMC307006          DOI: 10.1093/nar/23.12.2184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  35 in total

1.  Triple-helix formation is compatible with an adjacent DNA-protein complex.

Authors:  C C Huang; D Nguyen; R Martinez; C A Edwards
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1992-02-04       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 2.  Nucleosome positioning: occurrence, mechanisms, and functional consequences.

Authors:  R T Simpson
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  1991

3.  A new method for sequencing DNA.

Authors:  A M Maxam; W Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Kinetic analysis of deoxyribonuclease I cleavages in the nucleosome core: evidence for a DNA superhelix.

Authors:  L C Lutter
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1978-09-15       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Quantitative analysis of the glucocorticoid receptor-DNA interaction at the mouse mammary tumor virus glucocorticoid response element.

Authors:  T Perlmann; P Eriksson; O Wrange
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Nucleosome loss activates CUP1 and HIS3 promoters to fully induced levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L K Durrin; R K Mann; M Grunstein
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Inhibition of chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes correlates with derepression of the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter.

Authors:  T Perlmann; O Wrange
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Transcription factor loading on the MMTV promoter: a bimodal mechanism for promoter activation.

Authors:  T K Archer; P Lefebvre; R G Wolford; G L Hager
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-03-20       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Evidence that nucleosomes on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter adopt specific translational positions.

Authors:  E H Bresnick; C Rories; G L Hager
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  DNA triple-helix formation: an approach to artificial gene repressors?

Authors:  L J Maher
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.345

View more
  15 in total

1.  DNA triple-helix formation on nucleosome-bound poly(dA).poly(dT) tracts.

Authors:  P M Brown; K R Fox
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 2.  Potential in vivo roles of nucleic acid triple-helices.

Authors:  Fabian A Buske; John S Mattick; Timothy L Bailey
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 3.  Impact of alternative DNA structures on DNA damage, DNA repair, and genetic instability.

Authors:  Guliang Wang; Karen M Vasquez
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-21

4.  Effect of dC → d(m5C) substitutions on the folding of intramolecular triplexes with mixed TAT and C+GC base triplets.

Authors:  Carolyn E Carr; Rajkumar Ganugula; Ronald Shikiya; Ana Maria Soto; Luis A Marky
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2017-12-24       Impact factor: 4.079

5.  Understanding oligonucleotide-mediated inhibition of gene expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

Authors:  C Bailey; D L Weeks
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Nucleosome core particles inhibit DNA triple helix formation.

Authors:  P M Brown; K R Fox
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Investigation of the formation and intracellular stability of purine.(purine/pyrimidine) triplexes.

Authors:  A Debin; C Malvy; F Svinarchuk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  The capacity to form H-DNA cannot substitute for GAGA factor binding to a (CT)n*(GA)n regulatory site.

Authors:  Quinn Lu; John M Teare; Howard Granok; Marci J Swede; Jenny Xu; Sarah C R Elgin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Bioconjugation of oligonucleotides for treating liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Zhaoyang Ye; Houssam S Hajj Houssein; Ram I Mahato
Journal:  Oligonucleotides       Date:  2007

10.  Investigation of the intracellular stability and formation of a triple helix formed with a short purine oligonucleotide targeted to the murine c-pim-1 proto-oncogene promotor.

Authors:  F Svinarchuk; A Debin; J R Bertrand; C Malvy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.