Literature DB >> 7609507

Ambulatory blood pressure and blood pressure measured at home: progress report on a population study.

J A Staessen1, R Fagard, P Lijnen, L Thijs, S van Hulle, G Vyncke, A Amery.   

Abstract

To determine reference values for ambulatory blood pressure, a population sample of 718 subjects (20 through 88 years old) was investigated. Ambulatory blood pressure was recorded over 24 h, taking measurements at 20-min intervals from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. and at 45-min intervals from 10 p.m. to 8 a.m. Trained nurses also measured the conventional pressure at each participant's home. The ambulatory blood pressure in the 718 subjects averaged 119/71 mm Hg over 24 h, 125/76 mm Hg during the day (10 a.m.-8 p.m.), and 108/62 mm Hg at night (0 a.m.-6 a.m.). Compared with the daytime pressure, blood pressure at home was on average the same in all 718 subjects but was 3/1 mm Hg lower in 530 normotensive subjects. The 95th percentiles of the 24-h pressures were 134/85 mm Hg in 182 men below age 50, 145/87 mm Hg in 164 men aged > or = 50 years, 127/80 mm Hg in 198 women below age 50, and 141/81 mm Hg in 174 women aged > or = 50 years. In the normotensive subjects of these four strata, these percentiles were 132/82 mm Hg (n = 149), 128/80 mm Hg (n = 103), 125/79 mm Hg (n = 180), and 131/79 mm Hg (n = 98). In comparison with earlier results in a smaller sample (n = 318) from which treated patients were excluded, this analysis demonstrated consistent results in the determination of a reference frame for ambulatory monitoring. Nevertheless, the prognostic significance of such reference values needs to be established in longitudinal studies and clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7609507     DOI: 10.1097/00005344-199423005-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol        ISSN: 0160-2446            Impact factor:   3.105


  4 in total

1.  [Influence of circadian rhythms on cardiovascular function].

Authors:  L Grote
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Modern approaches to blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  J A Staessen; E T O'Brien; L Thijs; R H Fagard
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Comparing the effects of white coat hypertension and sustained hypertension on mortality in a UK primary care setting.

Authors:  Martin G Dawes; Gillian Bartlett; Andrew J Coats; Edmund Juszczak
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy: examining feasibility in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Katherine L Tucker; Kathryn S Taylor; Carole Crawford; James A Hodgkinson; Clare Bankhead; Tricia Carver; Elizabeth Ewers; Margaret Glogowska; Sheila M Greenfield; Lucy Ingram; Lisa Hinton; Khalid S Khan; Louise Locock; Lucy Mackillop; Christine McCourt; Alexander M Pirie; Richard Stevens; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.