Literature DB >> 7608846

Clinical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a new sonic toothbrush.

B D Johnson1, C McInnes.   

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of a new sonic toothbrush were studied in this single-blind study. The sonic toothbrush combines acoustic vibrations and dynamic fluid activity surrounding the bristles with direct mechanical scrubbing of tooth surfaces. Fifty-one subjects were randomly assigned to either the sonic or the manual toothbrush. Plaque scores were assessed before and after a 2-minute brushing at baseline and 1, 2, and 4 weeks. Gingivitis and sulcular bleeding scores were also taken at each evaluation. To assess long-term safety, 29 subjects returned after 6 months of product use. Repeated measures analysis of variance of the total mean plaque score indicated a significant difference between the devices over time (P < 0.01), with the sonic toothbrush demonstrating a greater level of plaque removal on all tooth surfaces. On average, the plaque reduction from the baseline score for the sonic toothbrush was 3 times greater than the manual brush. However, when broken down by dental region, the sonic toothbrush demonstrated an improved level of plaque removal ranging from 1.5 to 11.9 times better than the manual brush, with the greatest improvement in the interproximal and lingual areas. Both the gingivitis and sulcular bleeding scores exhibited a similar, significant reduction (P < 0.005) over time for both devices with an approximate 17% decrease in the gingivitis index and a 33% decrease in sulcular bleeding sites. Safety assessment after 6 months of use indicated no soft tissue abnormalities which could be attributed to the products.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7608846     DOI: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.7.692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  6 in total

1.  Sonic tooth brushing reduces gingival overgrowth in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Jodi M Smith; Craig S Wong; Eva B Salamonik; Beth M Hacker; Ruth A McDonald; Lloyd A Mancl; Bryan J Williams; Alfaiyaz Ibrahim; Frank A Roberts
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Effects of interactive power toothbrush with or without application assistance on the plaque, gingivitis, and gingival abrasion among dental students: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Sühan Gürbüz; Zeynep Turgut Çankaya; Ekin Cinal; Eda Gizem Koçyiğit; Ayşen Bodur
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 3.  Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health.

Authors:  Munirah Yaacob; Helen V Worthington; Scott A Deacon; Chris Deery; A Damien Walmsley; Peter G Robinson; Anne-Marie Glenny
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-17

4.  Oral cleanliness in daily users of powered vs. manual toothbrushes - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Waldemar Petker; Ulrike Weik; Jutta Margraf-Stiksrud; Renate Deinzer
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  Safety and Design Aspects of Powered Toothbrush-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Clarence Ng; James Kit Hon Tsoi; Edward C M Lo; And Jukka P Matinlinna
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-05

6.  Microleakage around Class V Composite Restorations after Ultrasonic Scaling and Sonic Toothbrushing around their Margin.

Authors:  Ronald E Goldstein; Suruchi Lamba; Nathaniel C Lawson; Preston Beck; Robert A Oster; John O Burgess
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.843

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.