Literature DB >> 7608757

Delay-tuned neurons in the midbrain of the big brown bat.

S P Dear1, N Suga.   

Abstract

1. The auditory midbrain in Eptesicus contains delay-tuned neurons that encode target range. Most delay-tuned neurons respond poorly to tones or individual frequency-modulated (FM) sweeps and require combinations of FM sweeps. They are combination sensitive and delay tuned. The index of facilitation (IF), a coefficient measuring combination sensitivity for individual delay-tuned neurons, ranged from 0.14 to 1.0, with an average of 0.64 +/- 0.24 (mean +/- SD). Of the 33 facilitated responses from 29 neurons, 23 (70%) exhibited IFs > 0.5, which corresponds to a facilitated response 3 times greater than the sum of the responses to individual pulse and echoes. Thus the responses of midbrain delay-tuned neurons are highly combination sensitive. 2. The response of midbrain delay-tuned neurons is phasic, with an average of 0.7 +/- 0.4 action potentials elicited per optimal pulse-echo pair. Thus midbrain delay-tuned neurons in Eptesicus act as probability encoders. 3. The distribution of best echo delays (BDs) of midbrain delay-tuned neurons ranged from 8 to 30 ms. As an ensemble, midbrain delay-tuned neurons encode target ranges of 138-516 cm. There is a basic correspondence between the physiologically determined span of midbrain BDs between 8 and 30 ms and the behaviorally determined borders of the approach (8- to 17-ms echo delay) and search stages (17- to 30-ms echo delay) of the insect pursuit sequence. Midbrain delay-tuned neurons can be separated into two subpopulations on the basis of the difference in distributions of the echo best amplitude (EBA) tuning at BD. The BDs of one subpopulation correspond to the span of search stage echo delays, and the BDs of the other subpopulation correspond to the span of approach stage echo delays. 4. EBAs of neurons in each subpopulation are tailored to the specific perceptual requirements of the corresponding behavioral stage. EBAs of midbrain neurons tuned to echo delays between 17 and 30 ms (N = 12) correspond to the search stage and are suited to the requirements of target detection. EBAs of midbrain neurons tuned to echo delays between 17 and 30 ms (N = 21) correspond to the approach stage and are suited to the requirements of target size discrimination. 5. The best FM sweeps for the pulse (PFM) and echo (EFM) were determined for each midbrain neuron. PFMs appear to cluster at frequencies corresponding to the three harmonic peaks in the emitted pulse power spectra.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7608757     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.3.1084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  14 in total

Review 1.  Neural mechanisms of target ranging in FM bats: physiological evidence from bats and frogs.

Authors:  Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  GABAergic disinhibition changes the recovery cycle of bat inferior collicular neurons.

Authors:  Y Lu; P H Jen; Q Y Zheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Stimulus-dependent auditory tuning results in synchronous population coding of vocalizations in the songbird midbrain.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Patrick R Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Duration tuning in the auditory midbrain of echolocating and non-echolocating vertebrates.

Authors:  Riziq Sayegh; Brandon Aubie; Paul A Faure
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Spatially selective auditory responses in the superior colliculus of the echolocating bat.

Authors:  D E Valentine; C F Moss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Neural processing of target distance by echolocating bats: functional roles of the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Wenstrup; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Dynamic representation of 3D auditory space in the midbrain of the free-flying echolocating bat.

Authors:  Ninad B Kothari; Melville J Wohlgemuth; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Echolocating bats rely on an innate speed-of-sound reference.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Situational and Age-Dependent Decision Making during Life Threatening Distress in Myotis macrodactylus.

Authors:  Xiaobin Huang; Jagmeet S Kanwal; Tinglei Jiang; Zhenyu Long; Bo Luo; Xinke Yue; Yongbo Gu; Jiang Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mechanisms of spectral and temporal integration in the mustached bat inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Jeffrey James Wenstrup; Kiran Nataraj; Jason Tait Sanchez
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.