Literature DB >> 7607970

Effectiveness of radiation therapy without surgery in metastatic spinal cord compression: final results from a prospective trial.

E Maranzano1, P Latini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In assessing effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), we performed a prospective trial in which patients with this complication were generally treated with RT plus steroids, and surgery was reserved for selected cases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred seventy-five consecutive patients with MSCC entered this protocol. Twenty (7%) underwent surgery plus RT, another 255 received RT alone. Of all eligible patients, 25 (10%) early deaths and 21 (8%) entering a feasibility study of RT without steroids, were not evaluable. Of the 209 evaluable cases, 110 were females and 99 males, and median age was 62 years. Median follow-up was 49 months (range, 13 to 88) and treatment consisted of 30 Gy RT (using two different schedules) together with steroids (standard or high doses, depending on motor deficit severity). Response was assessed according to back pain and motor and bladder function before and after therapy.
RESULTS: Back pain total response rate was 82% (complete or partial response or stable pain, 54, 17, or 11%, respectively). About three-fourths of the patients (76%) achieved full recovery or preservation of walking ability and 44% with sphincter dysfunction improved. Early diagnosis was the most important response predictor so that a large majority of patients able to walk and with good bladder function maintained these capacities. When diagnosis was late, tumors with favorable histologies (i.e., myeloma, breast, and prostate carcinomas) above all responded to RT. Duration of response was also influenced by histology. Favorable histologies are associated to higher median response (myeloma, breast, and prostate carcinomas, 16, 12, and 10 months, respectively). Median survival time was 6 months, with a 28% probability of survival for 1 year. Survival time was longer for patients able to walk before and/or after RT, those with favourable histologies, and females. There was agreement between patient survival and duration of response, systemic relapse of disease being generally the cause of death.
CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis of MSCC was a powerful predictor of outcome. Primary tumor histology had weight only when patients were nonwalking, paraplegic, or had bladder dysfunction. The effectiveness of RT plus steroids in MSCC emerged in our trial. The most important factors positively conditioning our results were: the high rate of early diagnoses (52%) and the number of tumors with favorable histologies (124 out of 209, 63%) recruited, and the choice of best treatment based on appropriate patient selection for surgery and RT or RT alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7607970     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00572-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  80 in total

Review 1.  Malignant spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Madhuri Yalamanchili; Glenn J Lesser
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2003-12

Review 2.  Metastatic epidural cord compression.

Authors:  Thomas N Byrne
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  A meta-analysis of surgery versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic spinal epidural disease.

Authors:  Paul Klimo; Clinton J Thompson; John R W Kestle; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  [Compression syndromes].

Authors:  J Wierecky; C Bokemeyer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  The role of radiation therapy in the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jim N Rose; Juanita M Crook
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-06

6.  Modern approaches to the management of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Zain A Husain; Arjun Sahgal; Eric L Chang; Pejman Jabehdar Maralani; Charlotte D Kubicky; Kristin J Redmond; Charles Fisher; Ilya Laufer; Simon S Lo
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 7.  Decision Making: Osteoplasty, Ablation, or Combined Therapy for Spinal Metastases.

Authors:  William Lea; Sean Tutton
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Contemporary Statewide Practice Pattern Assessment of the Palliative Treatment of Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Daniel E Spratt; Brandon R Mancini; James A Hayman; Thomas Boike; Lori J Pierce; Jean M Moran; Michael M Dominello; Mark Fireman; Kent Griffith; Shruti Jolly
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Metastatic spinal lesions: state-of-the-art treatment options and future trends.

Authors:  B A Georgy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Surgical treatment of cauda equina compression as a result of metastatic tumours of the lumbo-sacral junction and sacrum.

Authors:  Nasir A Quraishi; K E Giannoulis; S R Manoharan; K L Edwards; B M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.