Literature DB >> 7607967

Radiosurgery in the initial management of malignant gliomas: survival comparison with the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

J N Sarkaria1, M P Mehta, J S Loeffler, J M Buatti, R J Chappell, A B Levin, E Alexander, W A Friedman, T J Kinsella.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery on the survival of patients treated with malignant gliomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 115 patients from three institutions (75 from the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, 30 from the University of Wisconsin, and 10 from the University of Florida) were treated with a combination of surgery, external beam radiation therapy, and linac-based radiosurgery as part of similar institutional protocols from March 1988 through July 1993. Patients were stratified into six prognostic classes (classes 1-6) based on the recursive partitioning analysis of multiple prognostic factors previously reported by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.
RESULTS: The actuarial 2-year and median survival for all patients analyzed was 45% and 96 weeks, respectively. In comparison to the results from a previously published analysis of 1578 patients entered on three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group external beam radiotherapy protocols from 1974 to 1989, those patients treated with radiosurgery had a significantly improved 2-year and median survival (p = 0.01) corresponding with a standardized mortality risk ratio of 0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31, 0.85]. This improvement in survival was seen predominantly for the worse prognostic classes (classes 3-6). The 2-year survival for the radiosurgical patients compared with the previously reported patients was 81% vs. 76% for classes 1/2, 75% vs. 35% for class 3, 34% vs. 15% for class 4, and 21% vs. 6% for classes 5/6, respectively. Although Karnofsky performance status and prognostic class were significant on univariate analysis, only the Karnofsky score was a significant predictor of outcome on multivariate analysis. Median and 2-year survival for patients with a Karnofsky score > or = 70 was 106 weeks and 51%, respectively, as compared to 38 weeks and 0% for patients with a Karnofsky score < 70% (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of radiosurgery to conventional treatment (surgery and external beam radiotherapy) of malignant gliomas appears to improve survival when compared to historical reports. These results should be interpreted with caution because the recursive partitioning model does not completely predict the prognosis of the patients treated in the present study. Although this study suggests that radiosurgery may prolong survival in patients with malignant gliomas, the role of radiosurgery in the management of these patients remains to be defined by a prospective randomized trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7607967     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00621-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  32 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances: Radiotherapy.

Authors:  R P Symonds
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-10

Review 2.  Radiation medicine innovations for the new millenium.

Authors:  Dwight E Heron; Karen D Godette; Ray A Wynn; V Elayne Arterbery; Oscar A Streeter; Mack Roach; Joseph R Simpson; Melissa Blough; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Radiation therapy of pathologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults.

Authors:  John Buatti; Timothy C Ryken; Mark C Smith; Penny Sneed; John H Suh; Minesh Mehta; Jeffrey J Olson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Reevaluating stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: new potential for targeted dose-escalation.

Authors:  Ted K Yanagihara; Heva J Saadatmand; Tony J C Wang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  [Value of radiosurgery in first-line therapy of glioblastoma multiforme. The Heidelberg experience and review of the literature].

Authors:  M van Kampen; R Engenhart-Cabillic; J Debus; M Fuss; B Rhein; M Wannenmacher
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Radiosurgical boost for primary high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Flavio E Prisco; Eduardo Weltman; Rodrigo M de Hanriot; Reynaldo A Brandt
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  Controversies concerning the application of brachytherapy in central nervous system tumors.

Authors:  Bo-Lin Liu; Jin-Xiang Cheng; Xiang Zhang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Validation of the Medical Research Council and a newly developed prognostic index in patients with malignant glioma: how useful are prognostic indices in routine clinical practice?

Authors:  Fadime Akman; Rachel A Cooper; Mehmet Sen; Yildiray Tanriver; Süleyman Kentli
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Tithi Biswas; Paul Okunieff; Michael C Schell; Therese Smudzin; Webster H Pilcher; Robert S Bakos; G Edward Vates; Kevin A Walter; Andrew Wensel; David N Korones; Michael T Milano
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Integrated-boost IMRT or 3-D-CRT using FET-PET based auto-contoured target volume delineation for glioblastoma multiforme--a dosimetric comparison.

Authors:  Marc D Piroth; Michael Pinkawa; Richard Holy; Gabriele Stoffels; Cengiz Demirel; Charbel Attieh; Hans J Kaiser; Karl J Langen; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.