[Endoscopic colposuspension ("retziusscopy" versus laparoscopy). An effective extension of the surgical spectrum of stress incontinence?].

Within the framework of "minimal access surgery" a prospective randomised study was initiated at the Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Heidelberg University to examine the feasibility of endoscopical abdominal Burch colposuspension for stress incontinence (II-III), at laparoscopy and "retziusscopy". Further, also prospectively randomised, two suspension techniques: needle suspension and suspension by means of alloplastic material with stapler fixation, were compared, irrespective of the endoscopic approach chosen, especially because long-term results of our study population on colposuspension with fibrin glue which are now available, are below expectations, worse than those obtained with conventional techniques. Except for a bladder lesion (during laparoscopic dissection of the space of Retzius) no intra- or postoperative complications occurred in the pilot study group of 20 patients. Both types of endoscopic access proved technically feasible, and presented the typical advantages of minimal access surgery such as short hospitalization and rapid recovery. Short-term follow-up (2-12 months) showed subjective and objective results (continence in 18/20 patients), comparable to conventional abdominal procedures at laparotomy. Detailed evaluation of subgroups is not yet possible, since the number of patients it still too small and follow-up too short.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes