Literature DB >> 760532

Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. I. Evolution of the nonstress test.

L R Evertson, R J Gauthier, B S Schifrin, R H Paul.   

Abstract

On May 1, 1975, at Women's Hospital, Los Angeles County--University of Southern California Medical Center, a new antepartum fetal heart rate (AFHRT) protocol was put into clinical use. This included the widely used contraction stress test (CST) and a new concept of nonstress testing (NST). The NST was based on FHR response associated with fetal movements and was categorized as reactive (normal) or nonreactive (abnormal). The nonreactive fetus was then evaluated with a CST if not contraindicated. During the 24 months, May 1, 1975 to April 30, 1977, a total of 2,422 NST's were done in 1,169 patients with 1,547 (64 per cent) reactive and 829 (35 per cent) nonreactive. CST was done 939 times, with 851 (90.6 per cent) negative, 29 (3 per cent) positive, 13 (1.4 per cent) equivocal, and 46 (5.0 per cent) unsatisfactory. There were ten (3.3 per cent) perinatal deaths within one week of a negative CST, five (1.0 per cent) within one week of a reactive NST, and two (8.7 per cent) with a positive CST. A reactive NST was as predictive of good outcome as was a negative CST. Analysis of the nonreactive NST showed that two or more accelerations were not associated with abnormal CST's. Also, some nonreactive fetuses became reactive with oxytocin and had good outcome. These observations were utilized in the development of a newer, shorter NST which allows for fetal stimulation in an attempt to further define fetal well-being.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 760532     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(79)90406-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Fetal surveillance--update.

Authors:  M L Druzin
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun

2.  Automatic acoustic stimulation system for nonstress foetal state evaluation.

Authors:  R Marín; J Mira; M Iglesias
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Obstetric update: antepartum assessment of the foetus and its environment.

Authors:  F A Manning
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1983-01

4.  Nonstress testing in a physician's office--a five-year experience.

Authors:  W C Hill; M Alderson; T Henderson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-11

5.  Gestational diabetes: risks, management, and treatment options.

Authors:  Catherine Kim
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-10-07

6.  150 Years of the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Catherine S Bradley
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies.

Authors:  J G Lalor; B Fawole; Z Alfirevic; D Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

Review 8.  Methods for Monitoring Risk of Hypoxic Damage in Fetal and Neonatal Brains: A Review.

Authors:  Liaisan Uzianbaeva; Yan Yan; Tanaya Joshi; Nina Yin; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.587

Review 9.  Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Diana M Bond; Adrienne Gordon; Jon Hyett; Bradley de Vries; Angela E Carberry; Jonathan Morris
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-24

10.  Antenatal testing-a reevaluation: executive summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.

Authors:  Caroline Signore; Roger K Freeman; Catherine Y Spong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.