Literature DB >> 7605182

Future ambulation prognosis as predicted by somatosensory evoked potentials in motor complete and incomplete quadriplegia.

S R Jacobs1, N K Yeaney, G J Herbison, J F Ditunno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the efficacy of tibial somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in predicting ambulation in tetraplegic individuals.
DESIGN: This was a prospective study of a cohort of cervical spinal cord-injured patients who had SEPs recorded within 72 hours to 2 weeks post-SCI and whose ambulation outcome was followed up to 2 years post-SCI.
SETTING: Regional Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Center. PATIENTS: All male and female subjects admitted to the center from 1988 to 1991 between the ages of 15 and 60 years who demonstrated C4 through T1 complete and incomplete acute SCIs were asked to participate in this study. MEASUREMENTS: The tibial nerve cortical SEPs were graded as either present or absent. The waveforms were also graded as less than 0.5 microV or > or = 0.5 microV. Quadriceps strength plus touch and pin sensation were tested within 72 hours to 2 weeks post-SCI. Ambulation was rated as absent, exercise, household, or community. The ambulatory and clinical status were assessed monthly for 3 months, and then at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-SCI. Statistical analysis using the two-tailed Fisher's exact test was performed relating the initial clinical and SEP data to ambulation outcome up to 24 months post-SCI.
RESULTS: All 13 subjects with a right and/or left quadriceps manual muscle test (MMT) greater than 0/5 became ambulatory. Of the 9 subjects with an initial bilateral quadriceps MMT = 0/5, only 1 recovered enough lower limb function to ambulate (p = .0001). One of the 7 subjects with absent touch sensation in the lower limbs became ambulatory, whereas 14 of the 15 subjects with touch sensation present became ambulatory (p = .002). All 7 subjects with absent pin sensation in the lower limbs were nonambulatory, and 14 of 15 subjects with pin sensation present became ambulatory (p < .0001). Of the 9 subjects with bilaterally absent cortical SEP waveforms, 2 became ambulatory. Twelve of the 13 subjects with a cortical SEP wave present became ambulatory (p = .0015). Of the 10 subjects with a cortical SEP wave amplitude less than 0.5 microV, only two became ambulatory, whereas all 12 subjects with an amplitude > or = 0.5 microV became ambulatory (p = .00014). In no subject did the SEP predict future ambulation where the clinical examination did not also predict recovery of ambulation.
CONCLUSION: Both the early postinjury clinical evaluation and the SEP predicted ambulation outcome to a significant degree, but the SEP offered no additional prognostic accuracy over that provided by the clinical examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7605182     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80632-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  13 in total

1.  Outcome evaluation with signal activation of functional MRI in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jong Kwon Jung; Chang Hyun Oh; Seung Hwan Yoon; Yoon Ha; Sora Park; Byunghyune Choi
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-09-30

2.  Influence of Spinal Cord Integrity on Gait Control in Human Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Lea Awai; Marc Bolliger; Adam R Ferguson; Grégoire Courtine; Armin Curt
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Early acute management in adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 4.  Afferent input and sensory function after human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Recep A Ozdemir; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Classifications In Brief: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale.

Authors:  Timothy T Roberts; Garrett R Leonard; Daniel J Cepela
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Prognosis and recovery in ischaemic and traumatic spinal cord injury: clinical and electrophysiological evaluation.

Authors:  E Iseli; A Cavigelli; V Dietz; A Curt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Prevalence of spasticity in humans with spinal cord injury with different injury severity.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.974

8.  Comparison of multiple prediction models for ambulation following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  T Rowland; L Ohno-Machado; A Ohrn
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

9.  Does intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring have predictive value for functional recovery following spinal cord injury? A case report.

Authors:  Jason C Eck; Christopher J Martin; Anthony Lapinsky; Patrick J Connolly; Christian Dipaola
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 10.  Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Giorgio Scivoletto; Federica Tamburella; Letizia Laurenza; Monica Torre; Marco Molinari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.