Literature DB >> 7604154

A hybrid likelihood algorithm for risk modelling.

A M Kellerer1, M Kreisheimer, D Chmelevsky, D Barclay.   

Abstract

The risk of radiation-induced cancer is assessed through the follow-up of large cohorts, such as atomic bomb survivors or underground miners who have been occupationally exposed to radon and its decay products. The models relate to the dose, age and time dependence of the excess tumour rates, and they contain parameters that are estimated in terms of maximum likelihood computations. The computations are performed with the software package EPI-CURE, which contains the two main options of person-by person regression or of Poisson regression with grouped data. The Poisson regression is most frequently employed, but there are certain models that require an excessive number of cells when grouped data are used. One example involves computations that account explicitly for the temporal distribution of continuous exposures, as they occur with underground miners. In past work such models had to be approximated, but it is shown here that they can be treated explicitly in a suitably reformulated person-by person computation of the likelihood. The algorithm uses the familiar partitioning of the log-likelihood into two terms, L1 and L0. The first term, L1, represents the contribution of the 'events' (tumours). It needs to be evaluated in the usual way, but constitutes no computational problem. The second term, L0, represents the event-free periods of observation. It is, in its usual form, unmanageable for large cohorts. However, it can be reduced to a simple form, in which the number of computational steps is independent of cohort size. The method requires less computing time and computer memory, but more importantly it leads to more stable numerical results by obviating the need for grouping the data. The algorithm may be most relevant to radiation risk modelling, but it can facilitate the modelling of failure-time data in general.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7604154     DOI: 10.1007/BF01210540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  13 in total

1.  Relative risk models for assessing the joint effects of multiple factors.

Authors:  J H Lubin; W Gaffey
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Issues in analysing the effects of occupational exposure to low levels of radiation.

Authors:  E S Gilbert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Protection against radon-222 at home and at work. A report of a task group of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1993

4.  General relative risk functions for case-control studies.

Authors:  N E Breslow; B E Storer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Quantitative risk assessment of lung cancer in U.S. uranium miners.

Authors:  R W Hornung; T J Meinhardt
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Analysis of time and age patterns in cancer risk for A-bomb survivors.

Authors:  D A Pierce; M Vaeth; D L Preston
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  The effect of changes in dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates in the atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  D L Preston; D A Pierce
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  A survey of the Czechoslovak follow-up of lung cancer mortality in uranium miners.

Authors:  J Sevc; L Tomasek; E Kunz; V Placek; D Chmelevsky; D Barclay; A M Kellerer
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Fitting the Armitage-Doll model to radiation-exposed cohorts and implications for population cancer risks.

Authors:  M P Little; M M Hawkins; M W Charles; N G Hildreth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Calculating excess lifetime risk in relative risk models.

Authors:  M Vaeth; D A Pierce
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Lung cancer mortality among nuclear workers of the Mayak facilities in the former Soviet Union. An updated analysis considering smoking as the main confounding factor.

Authors:  M Kreisheimer; M E Sokolnikov; N A Koshurnikova; V F Khokhryakov; S A Romanow; N S Shilnikova; P V Okatenko; E A Nekolla; A M Kellerer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  The inverse dose-rate effect for radon induced lung cancer: a modified approach for risk modelling.

Authors:  M Kreisheimer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 1.925

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.