Literature DB >> 7603000

A positive, individually ventilated caging system: a local barrier system to protect both animals and personnel.

G Clough1, J Wallace, M R Gamble, E R Merryweather, E Bailey.   

Abstract

Most local barrier systems are designed primarily either to protect animals from airborne contamination (exclusion) or to ensure the safety of personnel (hazard containment). Few, other than isolators, are able to cope with the often conflicting demands to do both. The Positive Individually Ventilated system (PIV), which provides pressure adjustable, individual supply and exhaust ventilation to each cage has been tested with this in mind as well as the need to ensure that environmental conditions comply with the requirements of the Home Office Code of Practice (CoP). The results indicate that when compared with traditional open racking the system can reduce both the risk of animals becoming contaminated by airborne infection from the room and the risk of aeroallergens escaping from the cages into the room air. At the same time, environmental conditions within the cages are both less variable and less stressful to the occupants. Conditions of air temperature, relative humidity, ventilation rates, light intensity and (with appropriate air handling) sound levels, all comply with or are better than those required by the CoP. Even with the room air change rate set at only 8/h (8 ac/h) the air distribution system results in draught-free cage ventilation rates of around 50-120 ac/h. This means that with at least the PIV exhaust(s) linked directly into the air conditioning system of the building, the size of the latter and its associated running costs can be reduced by around 50%; this energy saving concept has been approved in principle by the Home Office. Additional benefits include the fact that bedding is kept much drier allowing further cost savings in bedding and associated labour costs. The system is thus beneficial to the animals in protecting them from airborne infection and other stresses. By providing a less variable environment it also helps to minimise the sort of interference with experiments which can arise from that source. Similarly, in accordance with the aims of 'The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations' (COSHH 1988) and the Health & Safety Executive (HSE 1990), by reducing dust levels in the room air, including allergens, it is also beneficial to the personnel working in the animal rooms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7603000     DOI: 10.1258/002367795780740221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  14 in total

1.  Growing male rats in individually ventilated and open-top cages.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kostomitsopoulos; Ismene A Dontas; Pavlos Alexakos; Pavlos Lelovas; Antonios Galanos; Euthimios Paronis; Evangelos Balafas; Konstantinos Paschidis; Alkiviadis Kostakis
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Effectiveness of shoe covers for bioexclusion within an animal facility.

Authors:  Judy M Hickman-Davis; Mackenzie L Nicolaus; Joann M Petty; Dianne M Harrison; Valerie K Bergdall
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Implications of natural occlusion of ventilated racks on ammonia and sanitation practices.

Authors:  Michelle A Creamer; Joann Petty; Tara Martin; Valerie Bergdall; Judy M Hickman-Davis
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Relevance of Electrical Light on Circadian, Neuroendocrine, and Neurobehavioral Regulation in Laboratory Animal Facilities.

Authors:  John P Hanifin; Robert T Dauchy; David E Blask; Steven M Hill; George C Brainard
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2020-10-19

5.  Hygieia Comfort Cages--better for the research mouse, better for your research dollars.

Authors:  Liz Kramer
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 12.625

6.  Nasal Histopathology and Intracage Ammonia Levels in Female Groups and Breeding Mice Housed in Static Isolation Cages.

Authors:  Angela M Mexas; Angela K Brice; Adam C Caro; Troy S Hillanbrand; Diane J Gaertner
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Evaluation of Various IVC Systems According to Mouse Reproductive Performance and Husbandry and Environmental Parameters.

Authors:  Mitchel G Stover; Jason S Villano
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 1.706

8.  Influence of 5 different caging types and the use of cage-changing stations on mouse allergen exposure.

Authors:  Susan Feistenauer; Ingrid Sander; Jörg Schmidt; Eva Zahradnik; Monika Raulf; Markus Brielmeier
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  New technique: Development of a large-scale isolation chamber system for the safe and humane care of medium-sized laboratory animals harboring infectious diseases.

Authors:  Xin Pan; Jian-cheng Qi; Ming Long; Hao Liang; Xiao Chen; Han Li; Guang-bo Li; Hao Zheng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.066

10.  The development of a specific pathogen free (SPF) barrier colony of marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) for aging research.

Authors:  Corinna N Ross; Steven Austad; Kathy Brasky; Celeste J Brown; Larry J Forney; Jonathan A Gelfond; Robert Lanford; Arlan Richardson; Suzette D Tardif
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.