Literature DB >> 7602350

Phase II study of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and oral etoposide chemotherapy for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group pilot study.

A C Wolff1, D S Ettinger, D Neuberg, R L Comis, J C Ruckdeschel, P D Bonomi, D H Johnson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A phase II study of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and prolonged oral administration of etoposide (ICE) in patients with untreated extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was conducted to assess toxicities, response, and median survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1990 and August 1992, 35 patients were treated. ICE doses were ifosfamide 5 g/m2 by 24-hour continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion with mesna on day 1, carboplatin 300 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1, and etoposide 50 mg/m2 orally on days 1 to 21 every 4 weeks for up to six to eight cycles (schedule I). Because of severe hematologic toxicity in the first 18 patients, the last 17 patients received ifosfamide 3.75 mg/m2 IV on day 1, carboplatin 300 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and etoposide 50 mg orally on days 1 to 14 (schedule II).
RESULTS: Nine of 18 patients (50%) on schedule I had 13 episodes of severe hematologic toxicity (one death), and only two (11%) received full doses on cycle 2. However, with schedule II, only four of 17 patients (24%) developed severe hematologic toxicity, and eight (47%) received full doses on cycle 2. Objective responses were observed in 29 of 35 patients (83%) (schedule 1, 16 of 18 patients [89%]; schedule II, 13 of 17 patients [76%]). There were eight (23%) complete responses (CRs) and 21 (60%) partial responses (PRs). The median survival duration was 8.3 months, and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 37% and 14%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: ICE with oral etoposide has comparable activity with other regimens in ED SCLC. However, the 2-year survival rate may be higher and ICE with the lower doses of schedule II could be given safely with acceptable toxicity. Further studies of ICE compared with standard two-drug regimens are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7602350     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.7.1615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current role of oral etoposide in the management of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P I Clark
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Benefit from ifosfamide treatment in small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huizhen Yang; Yun Ma; Zhida Liu; Zheng Wang; Baohui Han; Lijun Ma
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-25

3.  Phase I trial of intravenous carboplatin added to oral etoposide and oral cyclophosphamide for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  S M Grunberg; J Valentine; I Zackon; P Unger
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  The health-related quality of life and survival of small-cell lung cancer patients: results of a companion study to CALGB 9033.

Authors:  M J Naughton; J E Herndon; S A Shumaker; A A Miller; A B Kornblith; D Chao; J Holland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Outpatient treatment with epirubicin and oral etoposide in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  H Gogas; F J Lofts; T R Evans; F J Millard; R Wilson; J L Mansi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Syed Mustafa Karim; Jamal Zekri
Journal:  Oncol Rev       Date:  2012-04-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.