Literature DB >> 7601183

Survival and quality of life of patients with stage D1 (T1-3 pN1-2 M0) prostate cancer. Radical prostatectomy plus androgen deprivation versus androgen deprivation alone.

H G Frohmüller1, M Theiss, A Manseck, M P Wirth.   

Abstract

A series of 139 patients with histologically proven stage D1 (T1-3 pN1-2 M0) prostate cancer was reviewed in order to determine the influence of radical surgery in addition to hormonal treatment on long-term outcome with respect to survival and quality of life. In all 139 patients a pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed. In 87 patients, lymphadenectomy was followed by androgen deprivation alone (group 1). Fifty-two patients underwent additional radical prostatectomy (group 2). The actuarial 10-year nonprogression rates were 14.6% in group 1 and 35.8% in group 2, respectively (p = 0.0016). The overall and disease-specific 10-year survival rates were found to be 29.7 and 32.1%, respectively, for group 1 and 50.8 and 70.7%, respectively, for group 2. Local progression as the main parameter influencing quality of life occurred in 60 of the 87 patients (69%) not subjected to radical prostatectomy. Transurethral resection of the prostate was required in 29 of these patients. In contrast, following radical prostatectomy, only 4 of the 52 patients (8%) had local progression and only 1 patient (2%) needed a dilatation of the vesicourethral anastomosis for relief of infravesical obstruction. Thus, radical prostatectomy plus androgen deprivation for patients with stage D1 prostate cancer appeared to be superior to androgen deprivation alone with respect to survival expectancy and quality of life. Prospective randomized trials, however, have to be undertaken to verify these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7601183     DOI: 10.1159/000475161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Quality of life after radical urologic pelvic surgery and impact of inpatient rehabilitation].

Authors:  O Dombo; U Otto
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  M P Wirth; O W Hakenberg; M Fröhner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  The oncologic role of local treatment in primary metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pirus Ghadjar; Alberto Briganti; Peter J L De Visschere; Jurgen J Fütterer; Gianluca Giannarini; Hendrik Isbarn; Piet Ost; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Christian I Surcel; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Inge M van Oort; Ofer Yossepowitch; Guillaume Ploussard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Radical prostatectomy for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Veeratterapillay; S S Goonewardene; J Barclay; R Persad; C Bach
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Role of radical prostatectomy in clinically non-organ-confined prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Gratzke; Jutta Engel; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Localized or Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: Removing the Primary.

Authors:  Justin T Matulay; G Joel DeCastro
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Contemporary role of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vincenzo Pagliarulo; Sergio Bracarda; Mario A Eisenberger; Nicolas Mottet; Fritz H Schröder; Cora N Sternberg; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Optimal treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Manfred P Wirth; Oliver W Hakenberg; Michael Froehner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Secondary therapy, metastatic progression, and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; Scott E Eggener; Angel M Serio; Brett S Carver; Fernando J Bianco; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Quality of life and economic considerations in the management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marco Turini; Alberto Redaelli; Paola Gramegna; Davide Radice
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.