Literature DB >> 7598908

Effect of genotype on the efficiency of mouse embryo cryopreservation by vitrification or slow freezing methods.

A Dinnyés1, G A Wallace, W F Rall.   

Abstract

We examined possible genotype effects on the survival of 8- to 16-cell mouse embryos isolated from four inbred strains (C57BL/6N, BALB/cAnN, DBA/2N, and C3H/HeN), a outbred stock (ICR), and various crosses after cryopreservation by vitrification or conventional slow freezing using glycerol solutions. The rates of in vitro development of C57BL/6N, BALB/cAnN, C3H/HeN, and ICR embryos to expanded blastocysts ranged from 86% to 94% after slow freezing and 85% to 97% after vitrification. The cryopreservation method did not significantly influence in vitro embryo survival after thawing (P > 0.05). Although genotype significantly influenced the in vitro survival of embryos (P = 0.008), this presumably resulted from an increased difficulty in assessing the quality grade of C3H/HeN embryos prior to cryopreservation. The rates in vivo development of C57BL/6N, BALB/cAnN, C3H/HeN, DBA/2N, and ICR embryos to normal day 18-19 fetuses ranged from 19% to 64% after slow freezing and from 18% to 63% after vitrification. The in vivo development of cryopreserved embryos was significantly influenced by cryopreservation method and genotype (P = 0.01 and P = 0.001, respectively). Vitrification yielded significantly higher rates of in vivo development than that after slow freezing (P > 0.05). In vivo development rates of DBA/2N and ICR female X B6D2F1 male embryos after cryopreservation were significantly higher than that of embryos from BALB/cAnN and C3H/HeN mice (P < 0.05). These results indicate that parental genotype exerts little or no effect on the ability of embryos to develop in vitro after vitrification or slow freezing. Differences in the ability of cryopreserved embryos to develop normally in vivo may reflect inherent genotype related differences in their post-implantation developmental potential and not their sensitivity to cryoinjury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7598908     DOI: 10.1002/mrd.1080400406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  4 in total

1.  Fertility comparison between wild type and transgenic mice by in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Kuzhalini Vasudevan; James Raber; Jorge Sztein
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Cryopreservation of mouse embryos by ethylene glycol-based vitrification.

Authors:  Keiji Mochida; Ayumi Hasegawa; Kyuichi Taguma; Atsushi Yoshiki; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Different chromatin and energy/redox responses of mouse morulae and blastocysts to slow freezing and vitrification.

Authors:  Bence Somoskoi; Nicola A Martino; Rosa A Cardone; Giovanni M Lacalandra; Maria E Dell'Aquila; Sandor Cseh
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Collection and cryopreservation of hamster oocytes and mouse embryos.

Authors:  Nuno Costa-Borges; Sheyla González; Elena Ibáñez; Josep Santaló
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 1.355

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.