Literature DB >> 7598117

Longitudinal compliance with annual screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.

W Thomas1, C M White, J Mah, M S Geisser, T R Church, J S Mandel.   

Abstract

In a randomized, controlled trial of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer, the Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study carried out 11 annual mail screens in two phases between 1976 and 1992. This long-term compliance record of 15,476 individuals is summarized and related to demographic characteristics as well as to the screening experience of the participants. There was a strong and consistent effect of age, with peak compliance among participants about 70 years old, and lower compliance among the youngest (< or = 55 years) and oldest (> or = 80 years) participants. There was a significantly higher rate of screen compliance among participants who lived with other participants, compared with households where only one individual participated in the study. Finally, participants who underwent a diagnostic colorectal examination with negative results had significantly lower odds of compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7598117     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  10 in total

1.  Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population.

Authors:  Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Corey H Brouse; Celia Shmukler; Alfred Neugut; Lawrence T DeCarlo; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Anand; N Anand; A Anand
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Jessica Chubak; Sharon Fuller; Richard T Meenan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Andrea J Cook; Jessica Chubak; Sharon Fuller; Richard T Meenan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance among urban Hispanics.

Authors:  Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-04

6.  Presence and correlates of racial disparities in adherence to colorectal cancer screening guidelines.

Authors:  Diana J Burgess; Michelle van Ryn; Joseph Grill; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Joan M Griffin; Jennifer Ricards; Sally W Vernon; Deborah A Fisher; Melissa R Partin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  How do physician assessments of patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests differ from actual preferences? A comparison in Canada and the United States using a stated-choice survey.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; F Reed Johnson; Nathalie A Kulin; Semra Ozdemir; Judith M E Walsh; John K Marshall; Stephanie Van Bebber; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Effects of Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Large Community-Based Population.

Authors:  Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Joanne E Schottinger; Virginia P Quinn; Ann G Zauber; Jeffrey K Lee; Wei K Zhao; Natalia Udaltsova; Nirupa R Ghai; Alexander T Lee; Charles P Quesenberry; Bruce H Fireman; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Gender differences in attitudes impeding colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Paul Ritvo; Ronald E Myers; Lawrence Paszat; Mardie Serenity; Daniel F Perez; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Utilisation of preventative health check-ups in the UK: findings from individual-level repeated cross-sectional data from 1992 to 2008.

Authors:  Alexander Labeit; Frank Peinemann; Richard Baker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.