Literature DB >> 7598103

A computer assisted photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Part II: Results.

D M Cummins1, S E Bishara, J R Jakobsen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use standardized facial photographs to compare the soft tissue profile changes in persons with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions who were treated with either an extraction or a nonextraction treatment modalities. Ninety-one patients (44 extraction and 47 nonextraction) were evaluated using standardized facial photographs, available at pretreatment, posttreatment and 2-years in retention. The photographs were digitized and displayed on a computer monitor. Thirty-eight landmarks (18 frontal and 20 lateral) were located. From these landmarks, 29 angular and linear dimensions (8 frontal and 21 lateral) were constructed. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used to compare the absolute dimensions, as well as the incremental changes, between the extraction and nonextraction groups. The present findings indicate: (1) After treatment the upper and lower lips were retracted significantly more in the extraction group compared with the nonextraction group. These differences persisted into retention. (2) The upper lip length increased more among subjects who were treated without extractions. (3) The upper vermilion height in male subjects and the upper and lower vermilion heights in female subjects increased among subjects who were treated without extractions and decreased among subjects who were treated with four first premolar extractions. (4) The nasolabial angle became significantly more obtuse among the female subjects who were treated with four first premolar extractions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7598103     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70064-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  8 in total

1.  The concept of bimaxillary transverse osteodistraction: a paradigm shift?

Authors:  M Y Mommaerts; N Ali; P Correia
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-05-11

Review 2.  Accuracy of the third molar maturity index in assessing the legal age of 18 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bianca Marques Santiago; Leopoldina Almeida; Yuri Wanderley Cavalcanti; Marcela Baraúna Magno; Lucianne Cople Maia
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Pooja Mehta; Roshan M Sagarkar; Silju Mathew
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

4.  The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions.

Authors:  Dimitrios Konstantonis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Lip morphology changes following orthognathic surgery for Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Rafiqul Islam; Toru Kitahara; Lutfun Naher; Atsushi Hara; Shunsuke Nakata
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Frontal facial proportions of 12-year-old southern Chinese: a photogrammetric study.

Authors:  Charles Yat Cheong Yeung; Colman Patrick McGrath; Ricky Wing Kit Wong; Erik Urban Oskar Hägg; John Lo; Yanqi Yang
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Photogrammetric Comparison of Facial Soft Tissue Profile before and after Protraction Facemask Therapy in Class III Children (6-11 Years Old).

Authors:  Vahid Moshkelgosha; Arghavan Raoof; Ahmadreza Sardarian; Parisa Salehi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2017-03

8.  Photographic assessment of cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  Liliane de Carvalho Rosas Gomes; Karla Orfelina Carpio Horta; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini; Marcelo Gonçalves; João Roberto Gonçalves
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.079

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.