Literature DB >> 7596746

Prepulse inhibition of the startle eyeblink as an indicator of temporal summation.

T D Blumenthal1.   

Abstract

The inhibition of the human startle eyeblink response was assessed in three experiments in which the duration of the prepulse was manipulated. In all cases, inhibition of startle was more pronounced as prepulse duration increased from 6 to 50 msec. Inhibition of startle amplitude for single prepulses was not significantly different from that for paired prepulses (Experiment 1), but inhibition was more pronounced as prepulse intensity increased (Experiment 3). Varying the interval between prepulse offset and startle-stimulus onset had no significant effect on inhibition (Experiment 2). These data demonstrate the sensitivity of startle inhibition to prepulse duration, and suggest that this response system can be used to evaluate early temporal summation in the auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7596746     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  30 in total

1.  Presidential Address, 1974. The more or less startling effects of weak prestimulation.

Authors:  F K Graham
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Interaction versus independence of startle-modification processes in the rat.

Authors:  C L Stitt; H S Hoffmann; R R Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1976-07

3.  Prepulse rise time and startle reflex modification: different effects for discrete and continuous prepulses.

Authors:  T D Blumenthal; B J Levey
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  The startle response to acoustic stimuli near startle threshold: effects of stimulus rise and fall time, duration, and intensity.

Authors:  T D Blumenthal
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Temporal integration in normal hearing, cochlear impairment, and impairment simulated by masking.

Authors:  M Florentine; H Fastl; S Buus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal summation of loudness: an analysis.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Stimulus rise time, intensity, and bandwidth effects on acoustic startle amplitude and probability.

Authors:  T D Blumenthal; W K Berg
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Group and individual relations between sensation magnitudes and their numerical estimates.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-05

9.  Reflex modification in the domain of startle: I. Some empirical findings and their implications for how the nervous system processes sensory input.

Authors:  H S Hoffman; J R Ison
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  The startle eyeblink response to low intensity acoustic stimuli.

Authors:  T D Blumenthal; C T Goode
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  7 in total

1.  Modification of the human blink reflex by transient and sustained features of acoustic prestimulation.

Authors:  K Reilly; G Hammond
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Effects of prepulse intensity, duration, and bandwidth on perceived intensity of startling acoustic stimuli.

Authors:  Neal R Swerdlow; Terry D Blumenthal; Ashley N Sutherland; Erica Weber; Jo A Talledo
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Failure to sustain prepulse inhibition in adolescent marijuana users.

Authors:  Charles W Mathias; Terry D Blumenthal; Michael A Dawes; Anthony Liguori; Dawn M Richard; Bethany Bray; Weiqun Tong; Donald M Dougherty
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Midazolam effects on prepulse inhibition of the acoustic blink reflex.

Authors:  H Schächinger; B U Müller; W Strobel; W Langewitz; R Ritz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Impaired prepulse inhibition and prepulse-elicited reactivity but intact reflex circuit excitability in unmedicated schizophrenia patients: a comparison with healthy subjects and medicated schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Philipp A Csomor; Benjamin K Yee; Joram Feldon; Anastasia Theodoridou; Erich Studerus; Franz X Vollenweider
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle reflex as a function of the frequency difference between prepulse and background sounds in mice.

Authors:  Sidhesh Basavaraj; Jun Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prepulse inhibition of auditory change-related cortical responses.

Authors:  Koji Inui; Aki Tsuruhara; Minori Kodaira; Eishi Motomura; Hisashi Tanii; Makoto Nishihara; Sumru Keceli; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.288

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.