Literature DB >> 7596726

Infant sleep position following new AAP guidelines. American Academy of Pediatrics.

E Gibson1, J A Cullen, S Spinner, K Rankin, A R Spitzer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This report examines the response of families to the American Academy of Pediatrics June 1992 recommendation that healthy term infants be put to sleep on their back or side to decrease the risk of sudden infant death syndrome. Parents at two clinics and private practices were interviewed to ascertain sleep position practices.
METHODS: Parents of infants from 1 to 6 months of age who were in the waiting room for a well-child visit were eligible for study. A total of 760 interviews were conducted using a closed-ended questionnaire. Parents were asked about sleep position, positional changes during sleep, and factors that influenced their decision to position their infant prone, side, or supine. Interviews were conducted from September 1993 through April 1994. This interval was divided into two equal, 4-month time intervals. Sleep practices were compared during the first and second time periods. Differences between practice and clinic groups were measured. Groups were compared using the chi-square test, with results considered significant at P < .05.
RESULTS: The number of infants placed side or supine for sleep increased significantly since the inception of the study, from 38.1% to 59.1%. Despite this increase, parents reported that the impetus for changing position came from family or the media, rather than from health professionals. Initially, the proportion of infants in private practices placed side or supine was greater than that of clinic patients. That difference disappeared by the end of the study. Prone positioning continued to be more prevalent in the 3- to 6-month-old infants than in the 1- to 3-month-old group. The majority of infants at all ages awoke in the same position that they were put to sleep.
CONCLUSIONS: Side and supine positioning for sleep increased in all socioeconomic groups. A small number of infants placed side or supine for sleep are found prone on awakening. Health professionals need to increase their role in providing sleep position guidance. As the proportion of the population positioning their infants side or supine for sleep increases, it should be possible to examine the effect on the sudden infant death syndrome rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7596726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  6 in total

1.  Novel mechanism for sudden infant death syndrome: persistent late sodium current secondary to mutations in caveolin-3.

Authors:  Lisa B Cronk; Bin Ye; Toshihiko Kaku; David J Tester; Matteo Vatta; Jonathan C Makielski; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Transient neonatal hair loss: a common transient neonatal dermatosis.

Authors:  Mario Cutrone; Ramon Grimalt
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Overrepresentation of the proarrhythmic, sudden death predisposing sodium channel polymorphism S1103Y in a population-based cohort of African-American sudden infant death syndrome.

Authors:  David W Van Norstrand; David J Tester; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Maternal and infant characteristics associated with prone and lateral infant sleep positioning in Washington state, 1996-2002.

Authors:  Christy M McKinney; Victoria L Holt; Michael L Cunningham; Brian G Leroux; Jacqueline R Starr
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  A mechanism for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): stress-induced leak via ryanodine receptors.

Authors:  David J Tester; Miroslav Dura; Elisa Carturan; Steven Reiken; Anetta Wronska; Andrew R Marks; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Prevalence and factors associated with neonatal occipital alopecia: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Min Sung Kim; Chan Ho Na; Hoon Choi; Bong Seok Shin
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 1.444

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.