Literature DB >> 7595708

Randomized comparison of vinorelbine and melphalan in anthracycline-refractory advanced breast cancer.

S Jones1, E Winer, C Vogel, L Laufman, L Hutchins, M O'Rourke, B Lembersky, D Budman, J Bigley, J Hohneker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This prospective multicenter randomized trial was performed to compare the effectiveness and safety of intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine [NVB]; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC) with i.v. melphalan (Alkeran [ALK]; Burroughs Wellcome Co) in a heavily pretreated population of patients with anthracycline-refractory advanced breast cancer (ABC). Efficacy end points included time to disease progression (TDP), time to treatment failure (TTF), survival, tumor response rates, and quality of life (QL) and relief of cancer-related symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 24, 1990, and December 1, 1992, 183 patients were randomized (2:1) to treatment with NVB (30 mg/m2 weekly) or ALK (25 mg/m2 every 4 weeks) i.v. Patients were stratified by measurable or nonmeasurable-assessable disease and by treatment center.
RESULTS: Time to disease progression was significantly longer with NVB than with ALK, with a median 12 weeks versus 8 weeks, respectively (P < .001). NVB patients also had significantly longer time to treatment failure than ALK patients, with a median 12 weeks versus 8 weeks, respectively (P < .001). The effect of NVB on survival was also statistically significant (P = .034): 1-year survival rates were 35.7% with NVB and 21.7% with ALK and the median survival rate was 35 weeks and 31 weeks, respectively. In total, 46.5% of NVB patients and 28.2% of ALK patients achieved an objective response or stabilization of disease (P = .06). No intergroup differences were noted in patient-assessed QL and cancer-related symptoms. The most common toxicities were hematologic, including granulocytopenia with NVB and thrombocytopenia and granulocytopenia with ALK. Both drugs were generally well tolerated, and no septic deaths were reported.
CONCLUSION: This randomized trial demonstrates a survival benefit in anthracycline-refractory ABC. NVB was well tolerated and demonstrated activity superior to ALK in anthracycline-refractory ABC, without compromising QL. Based on activity of single-agent NVB in this difficult-to-treat patient population, investigations of NVB in combination with other anticancer drugs are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7595708     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.10.2567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  23 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer therapies in development. A review of their pharmacology and clinical potential.

Authors:  D de Valeriola; A Awada; J A Roy; A Di Leo; L Biganzoli; M Piccart
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  History of the Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center.

Authors:  Marvin J Stone; Billie E Aronoff; W Phil Evans; Joseph W Fay; Z H Lieberman; Carolyn M Matthews; George J Race; R Pickett Scruggs; C Allen Stringer
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-01

Review 3.  Eribulin -- a review of preclinical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Umang Swami; Imran Chaudhary; Mohammad H Ghalib; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Which patients with metastatic breast cancer benefit from subsequent lines of treatment? An update for clinicians.

Authors:  Raffaella Palumbo; Federico Sottotetti; Alberto Riccardi; Cristina Teragni; Emma Pozzi; Erica Quaquarini; Barbara Tagliaferri; Antonio Bernardo
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 5.  A new decision model for cost-utility comparisons of chemotherapy in recurrent metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  J Hutton; R Brown; M Borowitz; K Abrams; M Rothman; A Shakespeare
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine.

Authors:  D Levêque; F Jehl
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; R Bryan Rumble; Lisa A Carey; Steven E Come; Nancy E Davidson; Angelo Di Leo; Julie Gralow; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Beverly Moy; Douglas Yee; Shelley B Brundage; Michael A Danso; Maggie Wilcox; Ian E Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Breast cancer (metastatic).

Authors:  Justin Stebbing; Sarah Slater; Maurice Slevin
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2007-02-01

9.  A randomized feasibility study of docetaxel versus vinorelbine in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlo Palmieri; Constantine Alifrangis; David Shipway; Tri Tat; Vivienne Watson; Diane Mackie; Marie Emson; R Charles Coombes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-21

Review 10.  International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer: combination vs sequential single-agent chemotherapy.

Authors:  Fatima Cardoso; Philippe L Bedard; Eric P Winer; Olivia Pagani; Elzbieta Senkus-Konefka; Lesley J Fallowfield; Stella Kyriakides; Alberto Costa; Tanja Cufer; Kathy S Albain
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.