Literature DB >> 7595246

Internal representations of the motor apparatus: implications from generalization in visuomotor learning.

H Imamizu1, Y Uno, M Kawato.   

Abstract

Recent computational studies have proposed that the motor system acquires internal models of kinematic transformations, dynamic transformations, or both by learning. Computationally, internal models can be characterized by 2 extreme representations: structured and tabular (C. G. Atkeson, 1989). Tabular models do not need prior knowledge about the structure of the motor apparatus, but they lack the capability to generalize learned movements. Structured models, on the other hand, can generalize learned movements, but they require an analytical description of the motor apparatus. In investigating humans' capacity to generalize kinematic transformations, we examined which type of representation humans' motor system might use. Results suggest that internal representations are nonstructured and nontabular. Findings may be due to a neural network model with a medium number of neurons and synapses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7595246     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.5.1174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  37 in total

1.  Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; Z M Pine; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Interference between adaptation to double steps and adaptation to rotated feedback in spite of differences in directional selectivity.

Authors:  Gerd Schmitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Grip forces when passing an object to a partner.

Authors:  Andrea H Mason; Christine L Mackenzie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The internal model and the leading joint hypothesis: implications for control of multi-joint movements.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Characteristics of Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation Revealed by Task-irrelevant Clamped Feedback.

Authors:  J Ryan Morehead; Jordan A Taylor; Darius E Parvin; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Explaining savings for visuomotor adaptation: linear time-invariant state-space models are not sufficient.

Authors:  Eric Zarahn; Gregory D Weston; Johnny Liang; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotation through interaction between posterior parietal and motor cortical areas.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Terrence J Sejnowski; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Compensation for and adaptation to changes in the environment.

Authors:  Martina Rieger; Günther Knoblich; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Acquisition and generalization of visuomotor transformations by nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Rony Paz; Chen Nathan; Thomas Boraud; Hagai Bergman; Eilon Vaadia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.