Literature DB >> 759493

Adult age differences in false recognitions.

J L Rankin, D H Kausler.   

Abstract

Adult age differences in the depth of processing in recognition memory were examined for the three groups with mean ages of 19, 45, and 70 years. Subjects were tested for phonological and semantic false recognitions with a continuous recognition memory procedure using both moderate (4 sec) and slow (8 sec) presentation rates. Both middle-aged and elderly subjects displayed a greater false recognition effect for both rhymes (phonological) and synonyms (semantic) of previously presented items than did young adults. Thus, there appeared to be little, if any, age-related deficit in depth of processing as defined on a sensory-semantic dimension. On the other hand, middle-aged and elderly subjects correctly recognized fewer of the previously presented (i.e., old) items than did the young adults. Age-level differences in retention of old item information were viewed as reflecting differences in the extent of elaboration within a processing domain. Rate of presentation did not affect either processing depth as measured by false recognitions, or memory per se as measured by the recognition of old items.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 759493     DOI: 10.1093/geronj/34.1.58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol        ISSN: 0022-1422


  12 in total

1.  Data-driven recognition memory: a new technique and some data on age differences.

Authors:  A J Parkin; J Ward; E J Squires; H Furbear; A Clark; J Townshend
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Age differences in accuracy and choosing in eyewitness identification and face recognition.

Authors:  J H Searcy; J C Bartlett; A Memon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

3.  The effects of emotional content and aging on false memories.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger; Suzanne Corkin
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  False recency and false fame of faces in young adulthood and old age.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; L Strater; A Fulton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-03

5.  Age differences in veridical and false recall are not inevitable: the role of frontal lobe function.

Authors:  Karin M Butler; Mark A McDaniel; Courtney C Dornburg; Amanda L Price; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

6.  Flexible remembering.

Authors:  Wilma Koutstaal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

7.  Life-span development of visual working memory: when is feature binding difficult?

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Angela Kilb; J Scott Saults
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2006-11

8.  Familiarity and recognition of faces in old age.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; A Fulton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-05

9.  False recognition in younger and older adults: exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.

Authors:  K A Norman; D L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

10.  Representational explanations of "process" dissociations in recognition: the DRYAD theory of aging and memory judgments.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.