Literature DB >> 7594382

Research on critically ill and injured patients: rules, reality, and ethics.

K V Iserson1, D Lindsey.   

Abstract

Much of today's medical care relies on experience unsupported by investigation, and emergency medical care is no exception; research is necessary to improve this care. Critically ill and injured patients are the patients who will benefit the most from improvements in emergency medical diagnostic and treatment methods. Yet, the federal bureaucracy has effectively banned research on these patients, since they cannot generally give "informed consent." We argue that, with the proper safeguards, research on critically ill and injured patients should be performed in the emergency medicine (EDs and EMS) settings without informed consent. To require such consent when not obtainable compromises both the researchers who must get such consent and the patients who must continue to endure old, and often untested therapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; National Institutes of Health; Office for Protection from Research Risks

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7594382     DOI: 10.1016/0736-4679(95)80021-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  2 in total

1.  Has emergency medicine research benefited patients? An ethical question.

Authors:  Kenneth V Iserson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Informed consent in paediatric critical care research--a South African perspective.

Authors:  Brenda M Morrow; Andrew C Argent; Sharon Kling
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.