OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate control mechanism of the varying left ventricular performance in atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is characterized by a randomly irregular ventricular response, resulting in continuous variation in left ventricular beat-to-beat mechanical behavior and hemodynamic variables. METHODS: Fourteen patients with chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were studied, using a nonimaging computerized nuclear probe linked to a personal computer. Left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic and end-systolic volume counts, stroke volume counts and filling time were calculated on a beat-to-beat basis during 500 consecutive RR intervals. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess how ejection fraction was predicted by these variables. RESULTS: The preceding RR interval and end-diastolic volume showed a positive relation, and prepreceding interval and end-systolic volume an inverse relation, with ejection fraction (all p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the preceding interval and the end-diastolic volume were equally important in predicting ejection fraction. There was a relatively strong interaction between the preceding interval and end-diastolic volume, indicating that the influence of the end-diastolic volume on ejection fraction was diminished after long intervals. A second interaction showed that the effect of end-diastolic volume on ejection fraction was attenuated after short prepreceding cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Cycle length-dependent contractile mechanisms, including postextrasystolic potentiation and mechanical restitution, determine the varying left ventricular systolic performance during atrial fibrillation over the entire range of intervals. Beat-to-beat changes in preload, consistent with the Frank-Starling mechanism, also play a role, but their influence is diminished after long preceding and short prepreceding intervals.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate control mechanism of the varying left ventricular performance in atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND:Atrial fibrillation is characterized by a randomly irregular ventricular response, resulting in continuous variation in left ventricular beat-to-beat mechanical behavior and hemodynamic variables. METHODS: Fourteen patients with chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were studied, using a nonimaging computerized nuclear probe linked to a personal computer. Left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic and end-systolic volume counts, stroke volume counts and filling time were calculated on a beat-to-beat basis during 500 consecutive RR intervals. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess how ejection fraction was predicted by these variables. RESULTS: The preceding RR interval and end-diastolic volume showed a positive relation, and prepreceding interval and end-systolic volume an inverse relation, with ejection fraction (all p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the preceding interval and the end-diastolic volume were equally important in predicting ejection fraction. There was a relatively strong interaction between the preceding interval and end-diastolic volume, indicating that the influence of the end-diastolic volume on ejection fraction was diminished after long intervals. A second interaction showed that the effect of end-diastolic volume on ejection fraction was attenuated after short prepreceding cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Cycle length-dependent contractile mechanisms, including postextrasystolic potentiation and mechanical restitution, determine the varying left ventricular systolic performance during atrial fibrillation over the entire range of intervals. Beat-to-beat changes in preload, consistent with the Frank-Starling mechanism, also play a role, but their influence is diminished after long preceding and short prepreceding intervals.
Authors: A G Manolis; A G Katsivas; E E Lazaris; C V Vassilopoulos; N E Louvros Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Julius Traber; Lennart Wurche; Matthias A Dieringer; Wolfgang Utz; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Andreas Greiser; Ning Jin; Jeanette Schulz-Menger Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-07-19 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Roger Dillier; Richard Kobza; Susanne Erne; Michel Zuber; Patricia Arand; Paul Erne Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2010-10-17 Impact factor: 1.866
Authors: A Perne; F P Schmidt; M Hochadel; E Giannitsis; H Darius; L S Maier; C Schmitt; G Heusch; T Voigtländer; H Mudra; T Gori; J Senges; T Münzel Journal: Herz Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 1.443
Authors: M Takagaki; P M McCarthy; M Chung; J Connor; R Dessoffy; Y Ochiai; M Howard; K Doi; M Kopcak; T N Mazgalev; K Fukamachi Journal: Heart Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.994