Literature DB >> 7594078

Diagnostic value of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with bifascicular block: a prospective study of patients with and without syncope.

A Englund1, L Bergfeldt, N Rehnqvist, H Aström, M Rosenqvist.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with bifascicular block both with and without a history of syncope and to relate the findings to clinical events during follow-up.
BACKGROUND: Patients with bifascicular block have an increased risk of sudden death that is not reduced by pacemaker treatment. This risk could be related to a high incidence of ventricular arrhythmias.
METHOD: Programmed ventricular stimulation was performed in 101 patients with bifascicular block: 41 had a history of unexplained syncope, and 60 were asymptomatic.
RESULTS: Programmed ventricular stimulation resulted in a sustained ventricular arrhythmia in 18 patients (18%), 8 in the syncope group and 10 in the nonsyncope group (p = NS). Three patients in each group had an inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. During a mean follow-up of 21 months, 10 patients experienced a clinical event defined as sudden death (n = 4), syncope (n = 5) or appropriate discharges from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (n = 1). Only one of these patients had an inducible ventricular arrhythmia at baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: The inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias is high in patients with bifascicular block and of the same magnitude in patients with and without a history of syncope. Clinical events during follow-up were not predicted by programmed ventricular stimulation in either of the two groups. The finding of inducible ventricular arrhythmia in patients with bifascicular block should therefore be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7594078     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00354-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

1.  [Commentary on the guidelines the diagnosis and the therapy of syncope--the European Society of Cardiology 2001 and the update 2004].

Authors:  K Seidl; A Schuchert; J Tebbenjohanns; W Hartung
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-09

2.  Diagnosis, management, and outcomes of patients with syncope and bundle branch block.

Authors:  Angel Moya; Roberto García-Civera; Francesco Croci; Carlo Menozzi; Josep Brugada; Fabrizio Ammirati; Attilio Del Rosso; Alejandro Bellver-Navarro; Jesús Garcia-Sacristán; Miriam Bortnik; Lluis Mont; Ricardo Ruiz-Granell; Xavier Navarro
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  QTc interval evaluation in patients with right bundle branch block or bifascicular blocks.

Authors:  Damir Erkapic; Gerrit Frommeyer; Niklas Brettner; Korkut Sözener; Harry J G M Crijns; Melchior Seyfarth; Christian W Hamm; Harilaos Bogossian
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Cardiovascular assessment of falls in older people.

Authors:  Maw Pin Tan; Rose Anne Kenny
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Incidence of and risk factors for bundle branch block in adults older than 40 years.

Authors:  Joon Hoon Jeong; June Hong Kim; Yong Hyun Park; Dong Cheul Han; Ki Won Hwang; Dong Won Lee; Jun Hyok Oh; Sung Gook Song; Jeong Su Kim; Kook Jin Chun; Taek Jong Hong; Yung Woo Shin
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.884

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.