Literature DB >> 7593912

The time course of auditory segregation: concurrent vowels that vary in duration.

J D McKeown1, R D Patterson.   

Abstract

Human listeners perform well when identifying both members of simultaneous steady-state vowel pairs, even when the vowels start and stop at the same time, are presented monaurally, have approximately equal intensities, and have the same fundamental frequency (f0). The sensation described by listeners is of one dominant, vowel "colored" by the second, less easily identified, or nondominant vowel. Introducing a small separation in f0 between the vowels improves performance and listeners now report that there is a sensation of two voice sources rather than one. It has been suggested that listeners use an f0-guided segregation strategy in identifying two vowels that differ in f0. An experiment is reported in which four listeners attempted to identify both members of a pair of concurrent vowels which varied in duration from a single cycle of the stimulus waveform (one pitch period) up to eight cycles. A dominant vowel was identified with near 100% accuracy even in the single-cycle condition, whereas identification of the nondominant vowel showed a slow improvement up to eight cycles. A difference in f0 between the vowels improved identification of the nondominant vowel, but between three and four cycles of the vowels were necessary for this advantage. It is first concluded that the improvement in performance with stimulus duration is due to an improvement in identification of the nondominant vowel; and, second, a difference in f0 is not required for segregation of the dominant vowel which is available from stimuli which are too brief to provide a useful estimate of f0.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7593912     DOI: 10.1121/1.413373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Multiplexed and robust representations of sound features in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Jennifer K Bizley; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Sound identity is represented robustly in auditory cortex during perceptual constancy.

Authors:  Stephen M Town; Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Harmonic Cancellation-A Fundamental of Auditory Scene Analysis.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 5.  Age-related deficits in the processing of fundamental frequency differences for the intelligibility of competing voices.

Authors:  Jae Hee Lee
Journal:  Korean J Audiol       Date:  2013-04-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.