OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this trial was to clarify the effects of intravenous ketamine at anaesthetic and sub-anaesthetic dosages on gastrointestinal motility. DESIGN: 20 beagles (group 1: 3 mg/ketamine/kg/h, n = 10; group 2: 30 mg ketamine/kg/h, n = 10), were investigated. Gastric emptying (nuclide gastric emptying studies, liquid and semi-solid test meal), intestinal transit time (Hydrogen breath test with lactulose) and intestinal motor function (perfusion manometry with 8 measuring ports) were determined. As a control condition, the tests were performed on all dogs in the two groups during infusion of physiological saline solution. RESULTS: No significant differences in the motility patterns were present between 3 mg ketamine/kg/h and the control condition. For group 2, a moderately significant (p < 0.05) increase in the interdigestive motility index was observed for 30 mg ketamine/kg/h. However, this did not change the transit criteria. There was no significant difference between ketamine and control condition tests with regard to cycle and phase lengths or the propagation rate of the activity front. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ketamine provokes no basic changes in gastrointestinal motility, at either sub-anaesthetic doses. It can therefore be used to advantage in the continuous postoperative analgesia of intensive care patients, where repeated interventions are necessary and no cardiopulmonary contraindications are present.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this trial was to clarify the effects of intravenous ketamine at anaesthetic and sub-anaesthetic dosages on gastrointestinal motility. DESIGN: 20 beagles (group 1: 3 mg/ketamine/kg/h, n = 10; group 2: 30 mg ketamine/kg/h, n = 10), were investigated. Gastric emptying (nuclide gastric emptying studies, liquid and semi-solid test meal), intestinal transit time (Hydrogen breath test with lactulose) and intestinal motor function (perfusion manometry with 8 measuring ports) were determined. As a control condition, the tests were performed on all dogs in the two groups during infusion of physiological saline solution. RESULTS: No significant differences in the motility patterns were present between 3 mg ketamine/kg/h and the control condition. For group 2, a moderately significant (p < 0.05) increase in the interdigestive motility index was observed for 30 mg ketamine/kg/h. However, this did not change the transit criteria. There was no significant difference between ketamine and control condition tests with regard to cycle and phase lengths or the propagation rate of the activity front. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ketamine provokes no basic changes in gastrointestinal motility, at either sub-anaesthetic doses. It can therefore be used to advantage in the continuous postoperative analgesia of intensive care patients, where repeated interventions are necessary and no cardiopulmonary contraindications are present.
Authors: Nam Q Nguyen; Marianne J Chapman; Robert J Fraser; Laura K Bryant; Carly Burgstad; Katrina Ching; Max Bellon; Richard H Holloway Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-12-04 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Gareth A Williams; Marjorie E Koenen; Robert Havenaar; Paul Wheeler; Sonya Gowtage; Sandrine Lesellier; Mark A Chambers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-19 Impact factor: 3.240