Literature DB >> 7593708

Triazolam pharmacokinetics after intravenous, oral, and sublingual administration.

P D Kroboth1, J W McAuley, F J Kroboth, R J Bertz, R B Smith.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the relative and absolute bioavailability of triazolam, 0.25 mg, after the administration of the marketed oral tablet and a sublingual prototype wafer; an intravenous dose was used as a reference. Twelve men were evaluated in a three-way crossover study; study days were separated by 1 week. A single dose was administered to each subject at approximately 8 a.m.; serial blood samples were obtained for the determination of triazolam concentration. The fraction absorbed relative to intravenous was 20% higher in the sublingual than in the oral treatment (p = 0.0128); the difference between treatments was greatest in the first 2 hours as indicated by the area under the curve from 0 to 2 hours (p < 0.05). The extraction ratio ranged from 0.05 to 0.25, and the predicted availability after oral administration was 86% with a range of 75 to 95%. In contrast, the observed mean absolute availability was 44% (oral) and 53% (sublingual). A potential explanation for this discrepancy between predicted and observed bioavailability is that after oral administration, a fraction of triazolam may be metabolized by cytochrome P450IIIA4 in the gut wall, with a separate fraction subject to first-pass metabolism in the liver. Although this study was not designed to identify sites of triazolam metabolism, the proposed explanation is consistent with the occurrence of P450IIIA4 in the stomach, small intestine, and liver. Doses administered sublingually avoid first-pass metabolism, producing earlier and higher peak concentrations than do doses administered orally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7593708     DOI: 10.1097/00004714-199508000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  7 in total

1.  Understanding the oral mucosal absorption and resulting clinical pharmacokinetics of asenapine.

Authors:  Jeremy A Bartlett; Kees van der Voort Maarschalk
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of midazolam after intravenous, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal and oral administration under a chronic food-limited regimen: relating DRL performance to pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  C E Lau; F Ma; Y Wang; C Smith
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effect of voriconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Teijo I Saari; Kari Laine; Kari Leino; Mika Valtonen; Pertti J Neuvonen; Klaus T Olkkola
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Zaleplon (Sonata) oral sedation for outpatient third molar extraction surgery.

Authors:  Steven I Ganzberg; Thomas Dietrich; Manuel Valerin; F Michael Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Oral mucosal drug delivery: clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Jie Zhang; James B Streisand
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Metabolism of drugs by cytochrome P450 3A isoforms. Implications for drug interactions in psychopharmacology.

Authors:  L L von Moltke; D J Greenblatt; J Schmider; J S Harmatz; R I Shader
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Semiphysiologically based pharmacokinetic model for midazolam and CYP3A mediated metabolite 1-OH-midazolam in morbidly obese and weight loss surgery patients.

Authors:  M J E Brill; P A J Välitalo; A S Darwich; B van Ramshorst; H P A van Dongen; A Rostami-Hodjegan; M Danhof; C A J Knibbe
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.