Literature DB >> 7593005

Microhardness of bone at the interface with ceramic-coated metal implants.

S Stea1, M Visentin, L Savarino, G Ciapetti, M E Donati, A Moroni, V Caja, A Pizzoferrato.   

Abstract

We evaluated bone microhardness at the interface with hydroxyapatite-coated stainless-steel pins used in an external fracture fixation system. Pins were transversally inserted into the diaphyses of sheep tibiae and were loaded in for 6 weeks. Uncoated pins were implanted as controls. Microhardness analysis, based on the measure of the resistance of the bone to the penetration of a small diamond pyramid, yielded an accurate and reproducible measure of the mineralization degree and of the orientation of collagen fibers. Bone tissue close to the pin is less hard than bone tissue far from it. Moreover, the presence of hydroxyapatite coating on the pins did not significantly affect bone hardness; actually, the mean hardness at the interface with the pins was 56.9 Vickers degrees, whereas at the interface with the uncoated pins it was 62.2. It can be concluded that, 6 weeks postsurgery, the bone growing into the threadings of a loaded screwed implant reached maturity at a degree lower than that of the host bone in both uncoated and coated implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7593005     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820290604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  2 in total

1.  X-ray diffraction of bone at the interface with hydroxyapatite-coated versus uncoated metal implants.

Authors:  L Savarino; S Stea; D Granchi; M E Donati; M Cervellati; A Moroni; G Paganetto; A Pizzoferrato
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Indentation of bone tissue: a short review.

Authors:  P K Zysset
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.507

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.