Literature DB >> 7591988

A comparison of spinal ligaments--differences between bipeds and quadrupeds.

H Jiang1, M Moreau, V J Raso, G Russell, K Bagnall.   

Abstract

Following dissection, the spinal ligaments were observed in a selection of bipedal, pseudobipedal and quadrupedal animals during a search for an appropriate animal model for investigating the innervation of these ligaments. Midline spinal ligaments were found in all animals while lateral spinal ligaments could only be observed in bipedal (human) and pseudobipedal (avian) species. The presence of lateral spinal ligaments in these animals and their absence in quadrupeds suggests that the development of the lateral ligaments reflects a mechanical challenge unique to the erect spine and that these lateral spinal ligaments are fundamental to the stability of an erect posture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7591988      PMCID: PMC1167351     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  18 in total

1.  Mechanical analysis of forces involved in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  O LINDAHL; E RAEDER
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1962

2.  The synthesis of bipedal locomotion.

Authors:  M A Townsend; A Seireg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  A study of geometrical relationships in scoliotic spines.

Authors:  A B Schultz; H Larocca; J O Galante; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Physiologic strains in the lumbar spinal ligaments. An in vitro biomechanical study 1981 Volvo Award in Biomechanics.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; V K Goel; K Takata
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The forces and couples in the human trunk during level walking.

Authors:  A Cappozzo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Influence of the erect posture on the development of the lumbosacral region. A comparative study on the lumbosacral junction of the monkey, dog, rabbit and rat.

Authors:  W K Pun; K D Luk; J C Leong
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  The experimental study of scoliosis in bipedal rat in lathyrism.

Authors:  H Tanaka; Y Kimura; Y Ujino
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1982

8.  Scoliosis: incidence and natural history. A prospective epidemiological study.

Authors:  E J Rogala; D S Drummond; J Gurr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Experimental scoliosis in monkeys.

Authors:  S Thomas; P K Dave
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1985-02

10.  Supraspinous and interspinous ligaments in dog, cat and baboon.

Authors:  D J Heylings
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.610

View more
  4 in total

1.  The spatiotemporal development of innervation in spinal ligaments of chickens.

Authors:  H Jiang; M Moreau; N Greidanus; J Bilo; G Russell; J Raso; K Bagnall
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Thoracic spine morphology of a pseudo-biped animal model (kangaroo) and comparisons with human and quadruped animals.

Authors:  Sriram Balasubramanian; James R Peters; Lucy F Robinson; Anita Singh; Richard W Kent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Hyperactivation of p21ras and PI3K cooperate to alter murine and human neurofibromatosis type 1-haploinsufficient osteoclast functions.

Authors:  Feng-Chun Yang; Shi Chen; Alexander G Robling; Xijie Yu; Todd D Nebesio; Jincheng Yan; Trent Morgan; Xiaohong Li; Jin Yuan; Janet Hock; David A Ingram; D Wade Clapp
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Reflex control of the spine and posture: a review of the literature from a chiropractic perspective.

Authors:  Mark W Morningstar; Burl R Pettibon; Heidi Schlappi; Mark Schlappi; Trevor V Ireland
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2005-08-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.