Literature DB >> 7591314

The European Myocardial Infarction Project: an assessment of pre-hospital thrombolysis.

J P Boissel1.   

Abstract

The use of thrombolytic agents in patients with suspected myocardial infarction has been shown to reduce early and long-term mortality by about 20%, and it has been suggested that since time is an important factor, pre-hospital treatment would give better results. However, health deciders need reliable data on which to base future policies concerning this. The European Myocardial Infarction Project was a European Economic Community-supported double-blind study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pre-hospital early thrombolytic treatment in patients with suspected myocardial infarction compared with the same treatment given later in a hospital setting. A total of 5469 patients in 16 countries were randomised by 198 mobile emergency units to receive either pre-hospital treatment with anistreplase, the thrombolytic agent used, followed by placebo after hospital admission (pre-hospital group; 2750 patients), or placebo followed by anistreplase (hospital group; 2719 patients). The median time delay between the injections was 55 min. A non-significant decrease in 30-day mortality was observed in favour of the pre-hospital group (13%: P = 0.08), whereas the decrease in cardiac death observed, also in favour of the pre-hospital group, was on the borderline of significance (16%; P = 0.049). Although some complications occurred more frequently in the pre-hospital group in the pre-hospital period, the overall incidence for serious complications was similar for both groups. These results show that the pre-hospital thrombolytic strategy in patients with suspected myocardial infarction is both effective and safe when performed by well-equipped well-staffed mobile emergency units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7591314     DOI: 10.1016/0167-5273(95)02336-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cost implications of prehospital emergency drug administration. The case of prehospital thrombolytics.

Authors:  S Barton; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael McCaul; Andrit Lourens; Tamara Kredo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-10

3.  Thrombolysis in the air. Air-ambulance paramedics flying to remote communities treat patients before hospitalization.

Authors:  H Kapasi; L Kelly; J Morgan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Is advanced life support better than basic life support in prehospital care? A systematic review.

Authors:  Olli-Pekka Ryynänen; Timo Iirola; Janne Reitala; Heikki Pälve; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Prehospital thrombolysis--calculated health benefit for catchment population of one hospital.

Authors:  Mark Kroese; David Kanka; Peter Weissberg; Barbara Arch; John Scott
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 18.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.