Literature DB >> 7589677

Multifetal reduction of high-order multiple pregnancy: comparison of obstetrical outcome with nonreduced twin gestations.

J M Alexander1, K R Hammond, M P Steinkampf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the obstetric outcomes of twin pregnancies obtained as a result of multifetal pregnancy reduction to those in which pregnancy reduction had not been used.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
SETTING: University-based tertiary care infertility clinic. PATIENTS: Seventy-four twin pregnancies continuing beyond 10 weeks. Of these, 32 gestations had undergone reduction to twins at 10 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gestational age at delivery, birth weights, pregnancy complications.
RESULTS: All pregnancies advanced beyond 20 weeks gestation. The mean gestational age at delivery of the reduction group was 33.8 versus 35.7 weeks in the nonreduced group; only 25% of reduced pregnancies reached 37 weeks compared with 57.9% of nonreduced twins. The mean fetal birth weights of the two groups differed significantly (reduced: 2,038 g, nonreduced: 2512 g). The gestational age at delivery in patients reduced from triplets was significantly greater than in pregnancies reduced from quadruplets or higher. Multiple regression analysis revealed that for a given gestational age at delivery, a history of pregnancy reduction was associated with decreased birth weight.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that multifetal pregnancy reduction does not reverse completely the decreased gestational age and impaired fetal growth associated with high-order multiple pregnancy. Furthermore, fetal growth of reduced pregnancies seems to be impaired independent of the gestational age at which delivery occurs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7589677     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57985-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

Review 1.  The late effects of fetal growth patterns.

Authors:  F H Bloomfield; M H Oliver; J E Harding
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Perinatal outcome after multifetal pregnancy reduction.

Authors:  Seshadri Suresh; Suresh Indrani; Gurusamy Thangavel; Jagadeesh Sujatha
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 4.  Methods for Monitoring Risk of Hypoxic Damage in Fetal and Neonatal Brains: A Review.

Authors:  Liaisan Uzianbaeva; Yan Yan; Tanaya Joshi; Nina Yin; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.587

5.  Perinatal Outcome in Assisted Reproductive Pregnancies: Comparative Analysis of Reduced versus Unreduced Gestation.

Authors:  Shilpa Bhandari; Pallavi Agrawal; Ishita Ganguly; Aparna Singh; Nitika Gupta
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2016-11-23

6.  Birth Weight Reference Percentiles by Gestational Age for Turkish Twin Neonates.

Authors:  Ebru Yalın İmamoğlu; Mutlu Hayran; Sinan Mahir Kayıran; Gözde Zeybek; Sibel Sevük Özümüt; Güner Karatekin; Fahri Ovalı; Tuğba Gürsoy
Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr       Date:  2021-07-01

7.  Perinatal outcomes in dichorionic diamniotic twins with multifetal pregnancy reduction versus expectant management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bihui Jin; Qiongxiao Huang; Mengxia Ji; Zhizhi Yu; Jing Shu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.