Literature DB >> 758858

Several standard elective operations for duodenal ulcer: ten to 16 year clinical results.

J C Goligher, D B Feather, R Hall, R A Hall, D Hopton, T E Kenny, A J Latchmore, T Matheson, J H Shoesmith, F G Smiddy, J Willson-Pepper.   

Abstract

A survey was undertaken of 558 men with duodenal ulcer who had been treated ten to 16 years previously by truncal vagotomy and drainage, truncal vagotomy and antrectomy and subtotal gastrectomy. Of the 558, 65 had died and 111, presumed living, could not be traced, leaving 382 available for assessment. Between 75 and 85% of the traced patients were considered to have an excellent or very good result, which is a slight improvement on the previously published results in this same group of patients at five to eight years follow-up. Some of the side effects of operation had diminished slightly in frequency and there had been no significant increase in the incidence of recurrent ulceration since the previous survey. Anemia was an uncommon finding. As between the various forms of operation, truncal vagotomy and antrectomy and subtotal gastrectomy demonstrated significantly better protection against proven recurrent ulcer than did truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty (p less than 0.05). Compared with truncal vagotomy and gastroenterostomy, however, the results of both resection operations, though better, did not achieve statistical significance at p - 0.5 level (p less than 0.1). In regard to Visick gradings the resection procedures had better scores, but the differences were not significant at the p - 0.05 level, except for vagotomy and antractomy as compared with vagotomy and pyloroplasty. But it is stressed that in formulating a policy of surgical therapy for duodenal ulcer the greater inherent immediate risks of resection operations need to be borne in mind.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 758858      PMCID: PMC1396951          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197901000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  4 in total

1.  CONTROLLED TRIAL OF VAGOTOMY AND GASTRO- ENTEROSTOMY, VAGOTOMY AND ANTRECTOMY, AND SUBTOTAL GASTRECTOMY IN ELECTIVE TREATMENT OF DUODENAL ULCER: INTERIM REPORT.

Authors:  J C GOLIGHER; C N PULVERTAFT; G WATKINSON
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1964-02-22

2.  Five to eight-year results of Leeds-York controlled trial of elective surgery for duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  J C Goligher; C N Pulvertaft; F T De Dombal; J H Conyers; H L Duthie; D B Feather; A J Latchmore; J H Shoesmith; F G Smiddy; J Willson-Pepper
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1968-06-29

3.  Five- to eight-year results of truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty for duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  J C Goligher; C N Pulvertaft; T T Irvin; D Johnston; B Walder; R A Hall; J Willson-Pepper; T S Matheson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-01-01

4.  Truncal vagotomy and drainage for chronic duodenal ulcer disease: a controlled trial.

Authors:  F Kennedy; C MacKay; B S Bedi; A W Kay
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-04-14
  4 in total
  18 in total

1.  Prospective controlled vagotomy trial for duodenal ulcer. Results after 11-15 years.

Authors:  J Hoffmann; H E Jensen; J Christiansen; A Olesen; F B Loud; O Hauch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Comparison of laparoscopic truncal vagotomy with gastrojejunostomy and open surgery in peptic pyloric stenosis.

Authors:  Seok-Mo Kim; Jyewon Song; Sung Jin Oh; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Patient-Centered Outcome Instruments in Esophageal and Gastric Surgery.

Authors:  Livingstone Dore; Blake Fernandez; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Randomised clinical trials in surgery: a look at the ethical and practical issues.

Authors:  Anjan Kumar Das
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction is superior to laparoscopic total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Do Hyun Jung; Yoontaek Lee; Dong Wook Kim; Young Suk Park; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The Aarhus County Vagotomy Trial: trends in the problem of recurrent ulcer after parietal cell vagotomy and selective gastric vagotomy with drainage.

Authors:  D Andersen; E Amdrup; H Høstrup; F H Sørensen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Further experience with Pseudo-Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: its place in the management of neuroendocrine duodenal ulceration.

Authors:  S R Friesen; T Tomita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  On-table endoscopy following laparoscopic fundoplication.

Authors:  Narayanasamy Ravi; Nael Al-Sarraf; Paul Balfe; Patrick J Byrne; John V Reynolds
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Marginal ulcer. A difficult surgical problem.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; W C Meyers; J B Hanks; W J Kortz; R S Jones; R W Postlethwait
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Anterior lesser curve seromyotomy with posterior truncal vagotomy versus proximal gastric vagotomy: results of a prospective randomized trial 3-8 years after surgery.

Authors:  H S Walia; H A Abd el-Karim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.