| Literature DB >> 7587011 |
P F Hughes1, M Agarwal, P Newman, J Morrison.
Abstract
Although persuasive arguments against routine screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been made, it is widely but not universally performed as a part of antenatal care. There is no international agreement on methods or criteria used for screening (or for diagnosis), and administered glucose-load methods have significant practical difficulties in a busy antenatal clinic setting. However, recent evidence supports the concept of an increased level of importance being given to a diagnosis of GDM, with interest in the fetal and neonatal origins of adult disease being added to the short-term obstetric and fetal concern during pregnancy. A second generation fructosamine test, corrected for total protein, has been evaluated as a practical alternative to glucose screening for GDM in a busy, multi-ethnic antenatal clinic. This achieved a 79.4% sensitivity and a 77.3% specificity for a diagnosis of GDM confirmed by a glucose tolerance test using Carpenter's modified criteria. In view of the organizational simplicity of this sample/test requirement, a wider evaluation is suggested together with a re-evaluation of clinical outcome criteria rather than blood glucose levels alone.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1995 PMID: 7587011 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00574.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabet Med ISSN: 0742-3071 Impact factor: 4.359