Literature DB >> 7586522

Biochemical markers of bone turnover in patients with metastatic bone disease.

L M Demers1, L Costa, V M Chinchilli, L Gaydos, E Curley, A Lipton.   

Abstract

Several biochemical markers of bone formation and bone resorption have recently been developed. These markers have been evaluated for clinical utility in patients with metabolic bone disease, including Paget disease and osteoporosis, and for their potential use in cancer patients whose disease has metastasized to bone. We have evaluated seven markers of bone turnover in the plasma and urine of 94 patients with newly diagnosed or progressive malignancy with and without clinical evidence of bone metastases. As determined by a positive bone scan and (or) bone survey, 30 patients had metastases to bone; 51 patients had metastatic cancer without overt bony involvement; and 13 patients had local disease without bone metastases. To evaluate the predictive value of these markers in the metastatic population, we utilized a "Z-score" and logistic regression analysis to distinguish patients with documented bone metastatic disease from those patients without clinical evidence of bone metastases. The higher the Z-score, the better the marker predicts the presence of bone metastases. With this statistical approach, urine N-telopeptide measurements had the highest Z-score and the most significant association with the probability of bone metastases. Urine deoxypyridinoline was the second most predictive marker of bone metastases. Thus, biochemical markers of bone resorption might be of use to predict the presence of bone metastases in cancer patients and to monitor the efficacy of antiresorptive therapy in patients treated for metastatic bone disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7586522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  15 in total

Review 1.  Bone remodeling markers and bone metastases: From cancer research to clinical implications.

Authors:  Arlindo Ferreira; Irina Alho; Sandra Casimiro; Luís Costa
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-04-22

2.  Type I collagen as a marker of bone metabolism in sickle cell hemoglobinopathies.

Authors:  D M Bolarin; P Swerdlow; A M Wallace; L Littsey
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Serum biomarkers of bone metabolism in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with skeletal metastases: results from SWOG 0421.

Authors:  Primo N Lara; Benjamin Ely; David I Quinn; Philip C Mack; Catherine Tangen; Erik Gertz; Przemyslaw W Twardowski; Amir Goldkorn; Maha Hussain; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Ian M Thompson; Marta D Van Loan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Bone metastasis: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Larry J Suva; Charity Washam; Richard W Nicholas; Robert J Griffin
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  Phase II studies of two different schedules of dasatinib in bone metastasis predominant metastatic breast cancer: SWOG S0622.

Authors:  Anne F Schott; William E Barlow; Catherine H Van Poznak; Daniel F Hayes; Carol M Moinpour; Danika L Lew; Philip A Dy; Evan T Keller; Jill M Keller; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  The clinical importance of bone metabolic markers in detecting bone metastasis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Suna Bilgin Bayrak; Emel Ceylan; Mukadder Serter; Fisun Karadağ; Ece Demir; Orhan Çildağ
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Bone Turnover Markers in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Metabolic Bone Disease.

Authors:  Matthew B Greenblatt; Joy N Tsai; Marc N Wein
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Usefulness of bone metabolic markers in the diagnosis of bone metastasis from lung cancer.

Authors:  Jae Ho Chung; Moo Suk Park; Young Sam Kim; Joon Chang; Joo Hang Kim; Sung Kyu Kim; Se Kyu Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 9.  Bone markers and their prognostic value in metastatic bone disease: clinical evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Robert Coleman; Janet Brown; Evangelos Terpos; Allan Lipton; Matthew R Smith; Richard Cook; Pierre Major
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 12.111

10.  Bone Density in Patients with Cervical Cancer or Endometrial Cancer in comparison with Healthy Control; According to the stages.

Authors:  Yubin Lee; Ari Kim; Heung Yeol Kim; Wan Kyu Eo; Eun Sil Lee; Sungwook Chun
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.