Literature DB >> 7586466

Unilateral versus bilateral internal mammary revascularization. Survival and event-free performance.

L R Dewar1, W R Jamieson, M T Janusz, M Adeli-Sardo, E Germann, J S MacNab, G F Tyers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influence of unilateral (UL) and bilateral (BL) mammary artery revascularization, within age groups < or = 60 years and > 60 years, on patient survival, ischemic-related events, and interventional management was studied in 1142 patients who had coronary artery bypass graft surgery between 1984 and 1992. METHODS AND
RESULTS: UL revascularization was performed in 765 (67%) and BL in 377 (33%) patients with supplemental vein grafts. The overall early and hospital mortality rate was 2.7%. For UL in the age group < or = 60 years, it was 1.1%; for BL < or = 60 years, 1.3% (P = NS); for UL > 60 years, 4.3%; and for BL > 60 years, 2.8% (P = NS). Twenty-five preoperative patient characteristics representing demographics, extent of disease, concomitant disease, ventricular dysfunction, previous surgery, and status did not differentiate the patient groups (P = NS). Patient survival at 5 years was not different: 94% for UL < or = 60 years, 95% for BL < or = 60 years, 91% for UL > 60 years, and 86% for BL > 60 years (P = NS). The freedom from ischemic-related events was not different at 5 years (P = NS). The freedom from recurrent angina was 78% for UL < or = 60 years, 88% for BL < or = 60 years, 82% for UL > 60 years, and 83% for BL > 60 years (P = NS). The myocardial infarction freedom was 98% for UL < or = 60 years, 96% for BL < or = 60 years, 99% for UL > 60 years, and 97% for BL > 60 years (P = NS). The freedom from sudden unexpected death and cardiac death did not differentiate the groups (P = NS). The freedom from angioplasty and reoperation did not differentiate the groups (P = NS). The freedom from all ischemic-related and interventional events was 76% for UL < or = 60 years, 84% for BL < or = 60 years, 81% for UL > 60 years, and 79% for BL > 60 years (P = NS). A trend exists for less angina pectoris in the bilateral population < or = 60 years, which reflects in the trend in the freedom from overall events.
CONCLUSIONS: UL and BL mammary artery revascularizations have the same early mortality regardless of age but do not reveal any advantage for BL revascularization at 5 to 7 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7586466     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.9.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  7 in total

1.  A meta-analysis comparing bilateral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Aaron J Weiss; Shan Zhao; David H Tian; David P Taggart; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

Review 2.  Thirty-year experience with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: where have we been and where are we going?

Authors:  Paul Kurlansky
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Impact of double internal thoracic artery grafts on long-term outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  D Danzer; J T Christenson; A Kalangos; G Khatchatourian; M Bednarkiewicz; B Faidutti
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2001

Review 4.  [Arterial myocardial revascularization in the 9th decade of life. Personal results and review of the literature].

Authors:  A Mortasawi; I C Ennker; A Albert; U Rosendahl; F Dalladaku; T Alexander; J Ennker
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Unmeasured Confounders in Observational Studies Comparing Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Antonino Di Franco; Mohamed Rahouma; Derrick Y Tam; Mario Iannaccone; Saswata Deb; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Ahmed A Abouarab; Leonard N Girardi; David P Taggart; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Radial Artery Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery Versus Saphenous Vein as the Second Conduit for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Roberto Lorusso; Mohamed Rahouma; Ahmed Abouarab; Derrick Y Tam; Cristiano Spadaccio; Gaëlle Saint-Hilary; Jeremy Leonard; Mario Iannaccone; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Antonino Di Franco; Giovanni Soletti; Mohamed K Kamel; Christopher Lau; Leonard N Girardi; Thomas A Schwann; Umberto Benedetto; David P Taggart; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Use Rate and Outcome in Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: Insights From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Faisal Bakaeen; Umberto Benedetto; Mohamed Rahouma; Antonino Di Franco; Derrick Y Tam; Mario Iannaccone; Thomas A Schwann; Robert Habib; Marc Ruel; John D Puskas; Joseph Sabik; Leonard N Girardi; David P Taggart; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.