Literature DB >> 7586435

Intermittent warm blood cardioplegia. Warm Heart Investigators.

S V Lichtenstein1, C D Naylor, C M Feindel, K Sykora, J G Abel, A S Slutsky, C D Mazer, G T Christakis, B S Goldman, S E Fremes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Warm heart surgery implies continuous perfusion with normothermic blood cardioplegia. Interruption of cardioplegia, however, facilitates construction of distal coronary anastomoses and is the method practiced by many surgeons. To determine whether intermittency is harmful, we present results from 720 coronary bypass patients, protected with intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia, that were derived from a previous study of normothermic versus hypothermic cardioplegia. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Mean +/- SD age was 60.8 +/- 9.0 years; 27% of cases were urgent; 16% of patients had > 50% left main stenosis, and 19% had grade III or IV ventricles. A mean of 3.2 +/- 0.9 grafts was constructed. The average aortic cross-clamp time was 61.8 +/- 22.2 minutes. The longest single time off cardioplegia (LTOC) averaged 11.4 +/- 4.0 minutes per patient. The cumulative time off cardioplegia as a percentage of the cross-clamp time (PTOC) was 48.2 +/- 18.6% per patient. LTOC and PTOC were divided into quartiles (LTOC, < 10, 10 to 11, 12 to 13, and > 13 minutes; PTOC, < 36%, 36% to 49%, 50% to 62%, and > 62%) and related to the prespecified composite outcome of mortality, myocardial infarction according to serial CK-MB sampling, and low-output syndrome (LOS). Longer LTOC was harmful (event rates per quartile, 13.5%, 10.3%, 10.9%, and 19.0%; P = .046), whereas longer PTOC was protective (16.1%, 17.2%, 9.4%, and 10.6%; P = .07). Stepwise logistic regression was performed, controlling for demographic and angiographic predictors. In the multivariate models, LTOC remained detrimental (P = .07) and PTOC remained beneficial (P = .053). Additional modeling after entering surgeon identity (P < .001) into the risk equation eliminated the PTOC effect, whereas LTOC remained predictive of adverse outcomes (P = .053; odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00, 1.13).
CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that a reasonable margin of safety exists with intermittent, antegrade warm blood cardioplegia. Repeated interruptions of warm blood cardioplegia are unlikely to lead to adverse clinical results if single interruptions are < or = 13 minutes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7586435     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.9.341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  5 in total

Review 1.  Is there a rationale for short cardioplegia re-dosing intervals?

Authors:  Yves D Durandy
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-26

2.  Warm Blood Cardioplegia for Myocardial Protection: Concepts and Controversies.

Authors:  Taylor M James; Marcos Nores; John A Rousou; Nicole Lin; Sotiris C Stamou
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-04-01

3.  Assessment of the myocardial protective effect of antegrade warm blood cardioplegia by measuring the release of biochemical markers.

Authors:  K Kawahito; J Mohara; Y Misawa; M Kato; K Fuse
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Mechanisms of oxidative stress and myocardial protection during open-heart surgery.

Authors:  Nikolaos G Baikoussis; Nikolaos A Papakonstantinou; Chrysoula Verra; Georgios Kakouris; Maria Chounti; Panagiotis Hountis; Panagiotis Dedeilias; Michalis Argiriou
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

5.  Rationale for Implementation of Warm Cardiac Surgery in Pediatrics.

Authors:  Yves Durandy
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.418

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.