Literature DB >> 7581435

Prophylactic ankle bracing vs. taping: effects on functional performance in female basketball players.

L C MacKean1, G Bell, R S Burnham.   

Abstract

Ankle support devices are commonly used for prevention and treatment of ankle injury, but the effect of these on sport performance has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different ankle support devices on four basketball-related performance tests. Eleven female basketball players underwent four performance tests (vertical jump, jump shot, sprint drill, and submaximal treadmill run) while wearing five different types of ankle support on both ankles (no support, tape, Swede-O-Universal, Active Ankle, and Aircast). Ankle support effect on overall performance was assessed using Friedman's analysis of variance (ANOVA) by ranks and on specific performance parameters using one-way ANOVA for repeated measures. Overall performance was impaired by ankle support. The Active Ankle brace impaired performance the least out of the support devices. Vertical jump was less with ankle tape as compared with no tape (p < .05), whereas jump shot accuracy was better with tape as compared with the Swede-O-Universal (p < .05). Oxygen consumption (VO2) and energy expenditure were higher with the Aircast as compared with tape (p < .05). It was concluded that the use of ankle support by female basketball players does adversely affect basketball-related performance tests, and the prophylactic benefit of bracing needs to be weighed against performance impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7581435     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1995.22.2.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  12 in total

Review 1.  The effect of ankle bracing on athletic performance.

Authors:  S D Bot; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Ankle injuries in basketball: injury rate and risk factors.

Authors:  G D McKay; P A Goldie; W R Payne; B W Oakes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The influence of external ankle braces on subjective and objective parameters of performance in a sports-related agility course.

Authors:  Dieter Rosenbaum; Nina Kamps; Kerstin Bosch; Lothar Thorwesten; Klaus Völker; Eric Eils
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Ankle taping does not impair performance in jump or balance tests.

Authors:  Javier Abián-Vicén; Luis M Alegre; J Manuel Fernández-Rodríguez; Amador J Lara; Marta Meana; Xavier Aguado
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  The effects of two adhesive ankle-taping methods on strength, power, and range of motion in female athletes.

Authors:  Katherine E Quackenbush; Paula R J Barker; Shauna M Stone Fury; David G Behm
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-02

Review 7.  Role of ankle taping and bracing in the athlete.

Authors:  M J Callaghan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 8.  Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.

Authors:  P A Hume; D F Gerrard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Ankle bracing, fatigue, and time to stabilization in collegiate volleyball athletes.

Authors:  Megan Y Shaw; Phillip A Gribble; Jamie L Frye
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  [Conservative therapy of cartilage defects of the upper ankle joint].

Authors:  U C Smolenski; N Best; B Bocker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.