Literature DB >> 7581185

End-user search behaviors and their relationship to search effectiveness.

B M Wildemuth1, M E Moore.   

Abstract

One hundred sixty-one MEDLINE searches conducted by third-year medical students were analyzed and evaluated to determine which search moves were used, whether those individual moves were effective, and whether there was a relationship between specific search behaviors and the effectiveness of the search strategy as a whole. The typical search included fourteen search statements, used seven terms or "limit" commands, and resulted in the display of eleven citations. The most common moves were selection of a database, entering single-word terms and free-text term phrases, and combining sets of terms. Syntactic errors were also common. Overall, librarians judged the searches to be adequate, and students were quite satisfied with their own searches. However, librarians also identified many missed opportunities in the search strategies, including underutilization of the controlled vocabulary, subheadings, and synonyms for search concepts. No strong relationships were found between specific search behaviors and search effectiveness (as measured by the librarians' or students' evaluations). Implications of these findings for system design and user education are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7581185      PMCID: PMC226091     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 0025-7338


  4 in total

1.  An end user search service in an academic health sciences library.

Authors:  D Slingluff; Y Lev; A Eisan
Journal:  Med Ref Serv Q       Date:  1985

2.  Problems encountered by clinical end users of MEDLINE and GRATEFUL MED.

Authors:  C J Walker; K A McKibbon; R B Haynes; M F Ramsden
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1991-01

3.  Nonmediated use of MEDLINE and TOXLINE by pathologists and pharmacists.

Authors:  W Sewell; A Bevan
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1976-10

4.  MEDLINE on CD-ROM: end user searching in a medical school library.

Authors:  N Miller; M Kirby; E Templeton
Journal:  Med Ref Serv Q       Date:  1988
  4 in total
  12 in total

1.  Data discretization for novel resource discovery in large medical data sets.

Authors:  G Benoît; J E Andrews
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

2.  Using a decade of data on medical student computer literacy for strategic planning.

Authors:  Brenda L Seago; Jeanne B Schlesinger; Carol L Hampton
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2002-04

3.  An evaluation of unmediated versus mediated retrieval services.

Authors:  James D Buntrock; Christopher G Chute
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

4.  Cohort studies in health sciences librarianship.

Authors:  Jonathan Eldredge
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2002-10

5.  Librarians, clinicians, evidence-based medicine, and the division of labor.

Authors:  E A Holtum
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1999-10

6.  Evaluating medical student searches of MEDLINE for evidence-based information: process and application of results.

Authors:  S C Burrows; V Tylman
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1999-10

7.  BIOETHICSLINE use by medical students: curriculum-integrated instruction and collection development implications.

Authors:  J L Dorsch
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1997-04

Review 8.  Best methods for evaluating educational impact: a comparison of the efficacy of commonly used measures of library instruction.

Authors:  Katherine Schilling; Rachel Applegate
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2012-10

9.  SLIM: an alternative Web interface for MEDLINE/PubMed searches - a preliminary study.

Authors:  Michael Muin; Paul Fontelo; Fang Liu; Michael Ackerman
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  A tutorial on information retrieval: basic terms and concepts.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Neil R Smalheiser; Clement Yu
Journal:  J Biomed Discov Collab       Date:  2006-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.