Literature DB >> 7580670

Commissioning a national programme of research and development on the interface between primary and secondary care.

J Wisely, A Haines.   

Abstract

The first call for applications to the NHS research and development programme on the interface between primary and secondary care was advertised in February 1994. A total of 674 outline proposals were submitted and 54 (8%) secured funding. Projects have been commissioned in 16 of the 21 priority areas and around 6m pounds has been committed. Analysis shows that multidisciplinary applications are more likely to be funded and that the odds for a successful application are on average nearly doubled for each discipline represented up to five. A survey of applicants and peer reviewers found satisfaction with much of the commissioning process, but peer review and feedback were subject to criticism, particularly by unsuccessful applicants. The programme shows that it is possible to commission a large number of projects in an innovative area of research and development and has identified refinements that will further increase the efficiency and acceptability of the process.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7580670      PMCID: PMC2551375          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  1 in total

1.  Setting priorities for research and development in the NHS: a case study on the interface between primary and secondary care.

Authors:  R Jones; T Lamont; A Haines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-21
  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Hospital at home.

Authors:  S Shepperd; S Iliffe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-04-13

Review 2.  Health research priority setting in selected high income countries: a narrative review of methods used and recommendations for future practice.

Authors:  Jamie Bryant; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Justin Walsh; Jessica Stewart
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2014-11-18

Review 3.  Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency.

Authors:  Jonathan Shepherd; Geoff K Frampton; Karen Pickett; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.